Genetic code of research of Russians. A large-scale study of the genes of the Russian ethnic group has been completed. Russians, Slavs, Indo-Europeans and haplogroups R1a, R1b, N1c, I1 and I2

Classified secret

The scientific data below is a terrible secret. Formally, this data is not classified, since it was obtained by American scientists outside the field of defense research, and was even published in some places, but the conspiracy of silence organized around it is unprecedented.

What is this terrible secret, the mention of which is a worldwide taboo? This is the secret of the origin and historical path of the Russian people.

Agnation.
Why information is hidden - more on that later. First, briefly about the essence of the discovery of American geneticists.
There are 46 chromosomes in human DNA, half of which he inherits from his father, half from his mother. Of the 23 chromosomes received from the father, only one - the male Y chromosome - contains a set of nucleotides that is passed on from generation to generation without any changes for thousands of years. Geneticists call this set a haplogroup. Every man living now has in his DNA exactly the same haplogroup as his father, grandfather, great-grandfather, great-great-grandfather, etc. for many generations.
Thus, American scientists found that one such mutation occurred 4,500 years ago on the Central Russian Plain. A boy was born with a slightly different haplogroup than his father, to which they assigned the genetic classification R1a1. The paternal R1a mutated and a new R1a1 emerged.

The mutation turned out to be very viable. The R1a1 genus, which was started by this same boy, survived, unlike millions of other genera that disappeared when their genealogical lines were cut off, and multiplied over a vast area. Currently, holders of haplogroup R1a1 make up 70% of the total male population of Russia, Ukraine and Belarus, and in ancient Russian cities and villages - up to 80%. R1a1 is a biological marker of the Russian ethnic group. This set of nucleotides is “Russianness” from a genetic point of view.

Thus, the Russian people in a genetically modern form were born in the European part of present-day Russia about 4,500 years ago. A boy with the R1a1 mutation became the direct ancestor of all men now living on earth whose DNA contains this haplogroup. All of them are his biological or, as they said before, blood descendants and among themselves - blood relatives, together making up united people- Russian.
Having realized this, American geneticists, with the enthusiasm inherent in all emigrants in questions of origin, began to wander around the world, take tests from people and look for biological “roots”, their own and others. What they accomplished is of great interest to us, since it sheds true light on the historical paths of our Russian people and destroys many established myths.

Now men of the Russian genus R1a1 make up 16% of the total male population of India, and in the upper castes there are almost half of them - 47%
Our ancestors migrated from the ethnic home not only to the east (to the Urals) and to the south (to India and Iran), but also to the west - to where they are now located European countries. In the western direction, geneticists have complete statistics: in Poland, holders of the Russian (Aryan) haplogroup R1a1 make up 57% of the male population, in Latvia, Lithuania, the Czech Republic and Slovakia - 40%, in Germany, Norway and Sweden - 18%, in Bulgaria - 12 %, and in England - the least (3%).
The settlement of Russian-Aryans to the east, south and west (there was simply nowhere to go further to the north; and so, according to the Indian Vedas, before coming to India they lived near the Arctic Circle) became a biological prerequisite for the formation of a special language group- Indo-European. These are almost all European languages, some languages ​​of modern Iran and India and, of course, the Russian language and ancient Sanskrit, which are closest to each other for the obvious reason: in time (Sanskrit) and in space (Russian language) they stand next to the original source - Aryan the proto-language from which all other Indo-European languages ​​grew.

“It’s impossible to dispute. You need to shut up"
The above are irrefutable natural scientific facts, moreover, obtained by independent American scientists. Disputing them is the same as disagreeing with the results of a blood test in a clinic. They are not disputed. They are simply kept silent. They are hushed up unanimously and stubbornly, they are hushed up, one might say, completely. And there are reasons for this.
For example, we will have to rethink everything that is known about the Tatar-Mongol invasion of Rus'. The armed conquest of peoples and lands was always and everywhere accompanied at that time by the mass rape of local women. Traces in the form of Mongolian and Turkic haplogroups should have remained in the blood of the male part of the Russian population. But they are not there! Solid R1a1 - and nothing more, the purity of the blood is amazing. This means that the Horde that came to Rus' was not at all what is commonly thought of it: if the Mongols were present there, then in statistically insignificant numbers, and it is generally unclear who was called “Tatars”. Well, which scientist will refute scientific foundations, supported by mountains of literature and great authorities?!
The second reason, incomparably more significant, relates to the sphere of geopolitics. The history of human civilization appears in a new and completely unexpected light, and this cannot but have serious political consequences.
Throughout modern history, the pillars of European scientific and political thought proceeded from the idea of ​​Russians as barbarians who had recently climbed down from the trees, naturally backward and incapable of creative work. And suddenly it turns out that the Russians are the same Aryans who had a decisive influence on the formation of great civilizations in India, Iran and in Europe itself! That Europeans owe a lot to Russians for their prosperous lives, starting with the languages ​​they speak. What is no coincidence in modern history a third of the most important discoveries and inventions belong to ethnic Russians in Russia itself and abroad. It is no coincidence that the Russian people were able to repel the invasions of the united forces of continental Europe led by Napoleon and then Hitler. Etc.

Great historical tradition.
It is no coincidence, because behind all this there is a great historical tradition, thoroughly forgotten over many centuries, but remaining in the collective subconscious of the Russian people and manifesting itself whenever the nation faces new challenges. Manifesting itself with iron inevitability due to the fact that it grew on a material, biological basis in the form of Russian blood, which remains unchanged for four and a half millennia.
Western politicians and ideologists have a lot to think about in order to make their policy towards Russia more adequate in the light of the historical circumstances discovered by geneticists. But they don’t want to think or change anything, hence the conspiracy of silence around the Russian-Aryan topic.

The collapse of the myth about the Russian people.
The collapse of the myth of the Russian people as an ethnic mixture automatically destroys another myth - the myth of the multinationality of Russia. Until now, they have tried to present the ethno-demographic structure of our country as a vinaigrette from the Russian “you won’t understand what the mixture is” and many indigenous peoples and newcomer diasporas. With such a structure, all its components are approximately equal in size, so Russia is supposedly “multinational.”

But genetic studies provide a completely different picture. If you believe the Americans (and there is no reason not to believe them: they are authoritative scientists, they value their reputation, and they have no reason to lie in such a pro-Russian way), then it turns out that 70% of the entire male population of Russia are purebred Russians. According to the data of the penultimate census (the results of the latter are still unknown), 80% of respondents consider themselves Russian, i.e. 10% more are Russified representatives of other nations (it is in these 10%, if you “scratch”, that you will find non-Russian roots). And 20% falls on the remaining 170-odd peoples, nationalities and tribes living in the territory Russian Federation. Total: Russia is a mono-ethnic country, albeit multi-ethnic, with an overwhelming demographic majority of natural Russians. This is where Jan Hus' logic comes into play.

About backwardness.
Next - about backwardness. The clergy thoroughly contributed to this myth: they say that before the baptism of Rus', people lived in complete savagery. Wow, “wildness”! They mastered half the world, built great civilizations, taught the aborigines their language, and all this long before the birth of Christ... It doesn’t fit, it doesn’t fit at all true story with its church version. There is something primordial, natural in the Russian people that cannot be reduced to religious life.
In the north-east of Europe, in addition to the Russians, many peoples lived and still live, but none of them created anything even remotely similar to the great Russian civilization. The same applies to other places of civilizational activity of the Russian-Aryans in ancient times. Natural conditions they are different everywhere, and the ethnic environment is different, therefore the civilizations built by our ancestors are not the same, but there is something common to all of them: they are great on the historical scale of values ​​and far exceed the achievements of their neighbors.

Scientists have recently come close to deciphering the human genetic code. This largely allowed us to take a fresh look at the history of the Russian ethnic group, which turned out to be more ancient and not as homogeneous than previously thought.

In the depths of centuries

The human genome is a changeable thing. During the evolution of humanity, its haplogroups have undergone mutations more than once. Today, scientists have already learned to determine the approximate time when this or that mutation occurred. Thus, American geneticists found that one of these mutations occurred about 4,500 years ago on the Central Russian Plain. A boy was born with a different set of nucleotides from his father - he was assigned the genetic classification R1a1, which arose instead of his father's R1a.

This mutation, unlike many others, turned out to be viable. The R1a1 genus not only survived, but also spread over a large part of the Eurasian continent. Currently, approximately 70% of the male population of Russia, Belarus and Ukraine are carriers of haplogroup R1a1, and in old Russian cities this number reaches 80%. Thus, R1a1 serves as a kind of marker of the Russian ethnic group. It turns out that in the veins of most men modern Russia the blood of an ancient boy who lived in the late Neolithic era flows.

Approximately 500 years after the birth of haplogroup R1a1, migration flows of its representatives spread to the east – beyond the Urals, to the south – to Hindustan and to the west – to the territory of modern European countries. Archaeologists also confirm that the inhabitants of the Central Russian Plain went far beyond the boundaries of their ancestral range. Analysis of bone remains of burials in Altai of the 1st millennium BC. e. showed that in addition to the Mongoloids, pronounced Caucasians also lived there.

There is no Tatar

One of the issues of the popular science publication The American Journal of Human Genetics published an article about research by a Russian-Estonian team of scientists into the gene pool of the Russian people. The researchers' findings were quite unexpected. First: the Russian ethnos is heterogeneous in its genetic nature. One part of the Russians, living in the central and southern regions of the country, is close to the neighboring Slavic peoples, the other part - in the north of Russia - is genetically closely related to the Finno-Ugric peoples.

The next conclusion is more interesting. Scientists have never been able to detect the notorious Asian element in the Russian genome. The Tatar-Mongol set of genes is not present in any noticeable quantity in any of the Russian populations. It turns out that stable expression“Scratch a Russian and you will find a Tatar” is wrong.

Head of the Laboratory of Genomic Geography of the Institute general genetics RAS professor Oleg Balanovsky considers the Russian gene pool to be “almost entirely European,” and calls its differences from the Central Asian one “really great,” as if they were two different worlds.

Academician Konstantin Scriabin, head of the genomic direction at the National Research Center Kurchatov Institute, agrees with Balanovsky. He says the following: “We did not find any noticeable Tatar additions in the Russian genome, which refutes theories about the destructive influence of the Mongol yoke.” In addition, Siberians, according to the scientist, are genetically identical to the Old Believers - they have the same “Russian genome.”

Researchers also pay attention to the slight difference in genotype between Russians on the one hand and neighboring Slavic peoples - Ukrainians, Belarusians and Poles - on the other. The difference between the southern and western Slavs and the inhabitants of the Russian north is more pronounced.

Special markers

According to anthropologist Vasily Deryabin, the Russian genotype also has its own clear physiological markers. One of them is the predominance of light shades of eyes among Russians: gray, blue, gray-blue, blue. We have 45 percent of them, in Western Europe there are fewer – about 35 percent. There are many Russians and fair-haired people. According to anthropologists, there are no more than 5 percent of Russians with natural black hair. In Western Europe, the chance of meeting a black-haired person is 45%.

Contrary to popular belief, there are not many snub noses among Russians - about 7%, in about 75% of cases the nose is straight. Also, epicanthus is not found among Russians - a fold typical for representatives of Mongoloid peoples. internal corner eyes.

The Russian ethnic group is characterized by a predominance of blood groups I and II; among Jews, for example, group IV is more common. Biochemical studies have also shown that in the blood of Russians, as well as others, European peoples, there is a special gene RN-c, but it is absent in Mongoloids.

Northerners are closer

Research Institute of Molecular Genetics of the Russian Academy of Sciences and the Institute of Anthropology named after. D.N. Anuchin of Moscow State University conducted an in-depth study of the gene pool of the Russian people, during which they established a difference in the genotype between the Russians and our northern neighbors the Finns - it amounted to thirty conventional units. But the genetic differences between the Russian ethnic group and the Finno-Ugric peoples (Mordovians, Mari, Vepsians, Karelians, Komi-Zyrians, Izhorians), who traditionally lived in the north of our country, correspond to only three units.

Scientists talk not just about the genetic unity of Russians with the Finno-Ugrians, but about their common origin. Moreover, the specific structure of the Y chromosomes of these ethnic groups is in many ways identical to the peoples of Hindustan. But this is not surprising, given the direction of settlement of the genetic ancestors of the Russian people.

Something again began to be observed in the surge of Ukrainian-Slavic presence, too often from the lips of Ukrainian-patriots statements began to be heard that they, the black-browed ones, are the mega-Slavic people, but the Russians are only Bulgarian-speaking Chukhna and a mixture of different nations, and the Ukrainians are simply not an example of them an example of ethnic purity. Since the only witness to ethnic frequency can only be a science such as genetics, let’s turn to it and check how large the share of Slavic and non-Slavic blood is in our two ethnic groups.

According to Y-DNA (male), the main Slavic marker is the R1a1 haplogroup (mutations M-458 and Z-280), inherited by the Slavs from their Proto-Indo-European ancestors - of all the Indo-European peoples, R1a1 is most often found among the Slavs, and it is among the northern Slavs - the southern Slavs genetically closer to Romanians and Albanians and R1a1 is rare among them. Data on the distribution of R1a1 among Slavic peoples Europedia reports:

As we see, Ukrainians have a lower representation of R1a1 (43%) than Poles, Belarusians and Russians (46%), but higher than Czechs, Slovaks and South Slavs. Thus, “genetic pure” Slavic peoples do not exist at all, and Ukrainians are slightly inferior to Russians in terms of representation of the Slavic origin.

This is the data that official genetics gives us. But if you do not trust the sampling and conclusions of official science, then everyone can independently check their ethnic origin through DNA analysis, for these purposes there is international project in the field of molecular genealogy and population genetics -

The description of this project says: “By involving specialists from various sciences (historians, geneticists, linguists, archaeologists), genetic genealogists help confirm or refute one or another hypothesis (the ethnogenesis of peoples). Conclusions and assessments are largely comparative in nature, depending on the availability and replenishment of statistical data. This project is intended to contribute to this (accumulation of statistical data)." And here are the statistical data, that is, Y-DNA haplogroups, of real people from three Slavic countries that the project has accumulated:

Ukraine Russia Poland

R1a1 101(21.1%) 322(39.4%) 433(41.35%)

total 478,819,1049 participants.

Amazing statistics! Russia, with its large non-Slavic population - let me remind you once again that these are data for countries, not ethnic groups - is only slightly behind Poland in terms of the representation of the Slavic haplogroup R1a1 and is twice as large as Ukraine, where 97% of the population is Slavic. The statement that Ukrainians, unlike Russians, were able to preserve the purity of their ethnic group sounds almost mocking - almost all genetic markers, found among Russians, were also found among Ukrainians, and the most exotic haplogroups are most often found precisely in the territory between Don and San, and in more. And the myth about the allegedly Finno-Ugric origin of Russians is completely dispelled upon closer examination: the main haplogroup of the Ural-speaking peoples - N1 - was found in only 14.7% of Russians; for comparison, E1b alone - a Western Balkan haplogroup of African origin - was found in 16.5% of Ukrainians.

In general, genetic studies show that the influence of the Balkans on the gene pool of Ukrainians was simply enormous - in total, the main haplogroups of the Balkans - E1b, I2, T and J2 - make up 37.5% of the gene pool of Ukrainians according to official science (see European table) and 38.7 % according to SEMARGL statistical data - two to three times more than the Russians and Poles; however, Ukrainians could also receive J2 from the Caucasus, through Turkic tribes - the J2a4b subclade, characteristic of the Vainakh peoples, is often found in Ukraine.

(Map of representation of haplogroup I2 - Ukraine lies entirely in the distribution area of ​​this haplogroup characteristic of the Balkans.)

(Haplogroup E1b1b and its distribution in Africa, Europe and Asia)

It is even more interesting to study the representation of East Asian (Mongoloid) haplogroups in the gene pool of the Slavs. The myth about the Mongolian origin of Russians, although already dilapidated, still remains popular among some unassuming Ukrainians, but alas, geneticists testify to something else - Mongoloid haplogroups C, O and especially Q are more often found not in Russia, but in Ukraine; according to Europedia, it is Ukraine that shows the largest number of finds of haplogroup Q in Europe (4%, see table and map):

It should be noted here that in Ukraine there is almost only one subclade of this haplogroup - Q1b1, also found among the Uyghurs, Hazaras and 5% of Ashkenazi Jews - it seems that only one people could have awarded related East Eurasian genes to both Jews and Ukrainians - they were Turkic Khazars.

Thus, according to SEMARGL statistics, the East Eurasian (Mongoloid) component of the gene pool (according to Y-DNA) is 5.64% for Ukrainians, 3.17% for Russians, and 4% for Ukrainians and 1.5% for Russians, according to Europedia data. It is also interesting that the typically Negroid haplogroup E1a was also found among the Slavs, and in Ukraine, again, it is found more often. Western and South Asia also left their mark on genetic history Slavs - haplogroups J1, R2 and H; according to SEMARGL, they generally provide 12.34% of the Ukrainian and 6.06% of the Russian gene pools - and again the Asian influence is more clearly manifested in Ukrainians, rather than in Russians.

But the Russians received more Western European and Northern European genes; haplogroups R1b and I1 together provide 11% of the Russian and 7% of the Ukrainian gene pools according to Europedia, and 15.26% and 11.5% according to SEMARGL statistics.

(Prevalence of haplogroup R1b in Europe).

Another evidence of the North European influence on the Russian gene pool is haplogroup N1 - it is a generic marker of the Finno-Ugric peoples, but its presence is also great in the gene pool of the Baltic peoples (they also inherited it from the Finno-Ugric peoples), it was also found among the Scandinavians - a study of the DNA of Russian nobles from the tribe of Rurik showed that the legendary Varangian was also a carrier of haplogroup N1c1. The distribution of haplogroup N1 among Russians is uneven - it is most densely represented in the Russian North, on the lands of the former Novgorod and Pskov republics, in Central Russia it is already much less common, and in Southern Russia it is even less common than in Ukraine. According to Europedia, N1 in total accounts for 23% of the Russian gene pool (half the size of the Slavic haplogroup R1a1), according to SEMARGL -14.7% (2.5 times less than R1a1). According to mtDNA (female), the Finno-Ugric influence is a little more noticeable, but nothing more:

Boris Malyarchuk’s table: Russian regional populations by mtDNA (upper table) and Y-DNA (lower) - as we see, according to Y-DNA, only Russians of the Pskov region are close to the Finno-Ugric and Balts, and the remaining groups of Russians are closer to each other and others Slavic peoples; According to mtDNA, the genetic distance of Russian populations from each other is wider. The East Eurasian (Mongoloid) influence on the Russian mtDNA gene pool is also insignificant and is associated not with the Tatar or Mongolian, but with the Finno-Ugric influence:

Even in the Russian North, the East Eurasian mtDNA haplogroups in total provide only 4-5%, and the Russians of the Center and South have even slightly less Mongoloid mtDNA haplogroups than the Western Slavs. In total, according to the study of Malyarchuk and Co., the East Eurasian component of the Russian mtDNA is 1.9% , Ukrainians - 2.3% (gentis.ru/info/ mtdna-tutorial/freq). In general, the mtDNA gene pool of Russians and Ukrainians is quite close and is characterized by the predominance of haplogroups H, U, V and J, typically European.

So, the representation of the Slavic haplogroup R1a1 among Russians is higher than among Ukrainians, and the representation of non-Slavic people is lower. Of the extraneous influences in Russians, the most noticeable is the genetic influence of the Finno-Ugrians, as well as Western and Northern Europe, while among Ukrainians the influence of the Balkans and Western and Eastern Asia is more noticeable - most likely, Ukrainians got Asian genes from the Turkic peoples, since the Turks of the Black Sea-Caspian steppe themselves are a genetic mixture of East and Western Asia, the Caucasus and Europe. So draw a conclusion which of the two Slavic peoples is more Slavic. In conclusion, I post another table - the “average” faces of athletes from different European countries; don’t you think that the faces of Russian, Belarusian and Ukrainian athletes are surprisingly similar?

The Pentagon recognized experiments with biomaterials from Russian citizens

The apocalyptic assumption about the possible development of biological weapons by the Americans has received strong confirmation. The Pentagon admitted the fact of collecting biomaterials from Russian citizens.

The 59th Airlift Wing's Molecular Research Center is conducting musculoskeletal studies to identify various biomarkers associated with injury, according to Pentagon spokesman Beau Downey. Samples of Russian origin are required only because the first batch was from Russia, and now an identical one is needed for control.

Let us recall that the US Air Force intends to purchase 12 samples of RNA molecules and 27 samples of synovial (joint) fluid from Russians. An announcement about this was posted on the US government procurement portal. At the same time, the contract emphasizes that among all residents of Russia, the customer is only interested in Europeans, and immigrants, for example, from Ukraine will not be considered.

The issue of collecting biomaterials from Russians began to be discussed in society after Vladimir Putin made a public statement about this. According to him, biomaterials are collected “from different ethnic groups and people living in different geographical locations of the Russian Federation.” “The question is - why are they doing this?” - the president asked rhetorically at a meeting with human rights activists.

Later, Dmitry Peskov explained that they were talking about information received through the special services.

Putin's words caused caustic ridicule from some Russian society. “The ancient Incas were also afraid of such dirty tricks, so the supreme ruler even had special maids, whose task was to eat hair, spit, nail clippings and other biomaterial remaining from the Great, in order to avoid garbage falling into the wrong hands,” the media quotes teacher Andrei Nikulina.

However, the country is preparing at the legislative level to counter the new threat. It is expected that in December a law on the protection of biomaterials will be introduced to the State Duma. “Today we have many laboratories that conduct clinical research, these are foreign laboratories, for example, Invitro. We allowed them to access the most secret things,” Gennady Onishchenko, first deputy head of the Russian State Duma Committee on Education and Science, explained the problem.

Invitro denied its involvement in the export of biomaterials. In turn, the Institute of General Genetics of the Russian Academy of Sciences "SP" reported that this institution is involved in the collection of biomaterials. " Scientific supervisor Our institute, academician Nikolai Yankovsky, has just organized and headed the program for collecting biomaterials,” said Ilya Zakharov-Gesehus, an employee of the institute. It was not possible to promptly contact Yankovsky “SP” himself.

Senior researcher at the laboratory of genetics at the Institute of Developmental Biology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Alexey Kulikov, is inclined to justify his American colleagues.

We need to understand what the Americans did. They looked at how genes work in patients with damaged musculoskeletal systems and looked at the composition of synovial fluid. They initially purchased biomaterials somewhere in Eastern Europe from sick representatives of the Slavic nation and therefore control samples of people in whom everything is normal with the musculoskeletal system, they also need from representatives of the Slavic nation: Russians, Ukrainians, Belarusians, etc.

“SP”: - Well, how?! The tender explicitly states that biomaterials from Ukraine will not be considered. They need Russians...

All the same, this is not connected with any intentions there. Genetic weapons are all nonsense. This is unrealistic, since people in the world are too polymorphic - very diverse. It is difficult to come up with something that will work on some people and not others. I think this is simply about the experimental conditions. Eat scientific experience and there is control. Control materials must be from the same region.

“SP”: - Everything is so, if these “scientific research” were not carried out by the military, the Pentagon...

Scientific research can also be carried out by the military. We also have specific medical tasks that are solved by representatives of law enforcement agencies. Perhaps we are talking about low mobility among pilots. They should for a long time sit. Therefore, it is fundamentally important that there are no problems with the musculoskeletal system. Therefore, Americans are interested in these diseases and which specific genes are responsible for them.

In turn, the head of the laboratory of the Institute of General Genetics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Sergei Kiselev, believes that creating genetic weapons is too risky and it is easier to kill people using traditional methods.

Biomaterials from Russia were and are being transferred. At least, as Onishchenko said, within the framework of clinical trials. Because over the past 25 years, dozens of foreign companies have been conducting clinical trials of drugs in Russia. Biomaterials are needed to understand how drugs work.

Of course, any such sample can be used both for the above purposes and for some others. Because he still remains a national biological specimen. The main thing is how the information obtained using the sample will be subsequently used. Genetic information can be used for a variety of purposes, including for personal gain.

“SP”: - Which ones?

Today's technologies make it possible to determine the genome of each person in detail. That is, by taking a DNA sample from a spoon in the cafeteria of the CIA building, you can determine whether the intelligence officer really comes from the state of Minnesota, as he wrote when applying for a job, or whether he is from Eastern Siberia. That is, you can very accurately tie a person to a place.

But to do this, you must first create a genetic map of the territories. I think that the interested intelligence services of many countries around the world have been making such maps of territories for a long time. To be able to identify people in different circumstances.

For example, people dangerous professions. If one of them is torn to pieces, then, using a genetic map, it is possible to establish who he is, where he came from and give him his due. That is, within the country. But if this information falls into third hands, it can be used to their advantage.

“SP”: - In this case, we are interested in the likelihood of creating genetic, ethnic weapons...

In my opinion, creating such weapons is pointless. Firstly, in order to kill a person, you need to influence vital functions such as breathing, blood circulation, etc. There are few of them, and they are the same for all people. It is hardly possible to find an ethnically important vital function.

And secondly, who are the Americans? They don’t have a titular nation. Everyone mixed there, including Russians, Chinese, Anglo-Saxons. Therefore, if you create a weapon against the Russians, some Americans will fall under its action, since they are either Russians or their descendants.

Therefore, than in to a greater extent As people spread across the planet and genomes move, the less likely it is that it will be possible to create genetic weapons. It's not profitable. It’s easier, cheaper and more effective to “soak” in another way.

“SP”: - Nevertheless, the Pentagon is conducting such research, and today its representative directly admitted this...

I looked at the terms of the tender. This Air Force base requested RNA samples. But RNA is subgenetic material. It is an intermediary between the human genome and the functional state of the cell. RNA reflects the specialization of each individual cell at one time or another. That is, the genome - the DNA in every cell of the body is always the same. And the RNA in every cell is different because it is a portrait of how the genome works at any given moment. Therefore, an RNA sample taken from a big toe will be different from RNA from any other organ. The Americans did not indicate where exactly they needed the RNA.

The second thing they asked for was synovial fluid from the joint capsule. Moreover, in the terms of the tender it was stipulated that the liquid could be taken from another donor, not from the one from whom the RNA was collected. That is, Americans do not need any connection between RNA and synovial fluid. It looks like they were taking samples for different studies that were not related to each other.

“SP”: - However, this did not increase clarity...

Maybe they laundered money there that way. Or students learned to write tender applications.

But former member of the UN Commission on Biological Weapons Igor Nikulin has no doubt about the Pentagon’s aggressive plans.

Of course, this is an attempt by the Americans to conduct research for military purposes. The Pentagon is not a charitable or humanitarian organization designed to benefit humanity. Quite the contrary. It is possible to use viruses that will act selectively.

Such viruses still exist today. For example, Ebola, Lassa, Marburg. The hemorrhagic fevers they cause affect mainly the Negroid race, bird flu - the Mongoloid race, and atypical pneumonia - the Indo-Europeans.

“SP”: - For some reason, in the conditions of the competition, an exception is made for Ukraine...

In Ukraine, the American program was carried out 5-7 years ago. And now they have only epidemics. Now measles, now rubella, now tuberculosis, now tetanus, now cholera, etc. And then the Americans offer them vaccines against this. Very convenient.

Over the past ten years, the United States has spent tens of billions of dollars and created more than four hundred laboratories around the world in which new types of biological weapons and vaccines for them are being developed. About forty laboratories are located in countries former USSR. These are Ukraine, Moldova, Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan. This is controlled chaos.

“SP”: - But our Russian geneticists are skeptical about the likely development of weapons aimed at one or another ethnic group…

What else can they do? Many of them are on grants. If I were on a grant, I would also remain silent. But since the Americans will not offer me any grants, I can speak freely on these topics.

Rate the news
Partner news:

American geneticists found that four and a half thousand years ago, on the Central Russian Plain, a boy was born with a slightly different haplogroup than his father, to which scientists assigned the genetic classification R1a1.

The paternal R1a mutated and a new R1a1 emerged.

The mutation turned out to be very viable. The genus R1a1, which was started by this same boy, survived and multiplied over a vast area. Currently, holders of haplogroup R1a1 make up 70% of the total male population of Russia, Ukraine and Belarus, and in ancient Russian cities and villages - up to 80%.

R1a1 is a biological marker of the Russian ethnic group. This set of nucleotides is “Russianness” from a genetic point of view.

So, having emerged 4,500 years ago on the Central Russian plain, the Russian people quickly multiplied and began to expand their habitat.

4000 years ago, our ancestors went to the Urals and created Arkaim and a “civilization of cities” there with many copper mines and international connections all the way to Crete (chemical analysis of some of the products found there shows that the copper is Ural).

They looked then exactly the same as we do now; the ancient Rus did not have any Mongoloid or other non-Russian features. Scientists have recreated the appearance of a young woman from the “civilization of cities” from bone remains - the result is a typical Russian beauty, millions of the same live in our time in the Russian outback.

Another 500 years later, three and a half thousand years ago, haplogroup R1a1 appeared in India. The history of the Russians’ arrival in India is better known than other vicissitudes of the territorial expansion of our ancestors thanks to ancient Indian epic, in which his circumstances are described in sufficient detail. But there is other evidence of this epic, including archaeological and linguistic.

According to the huge amount of data accumulated by linguistics, comparative analysis languages, ancient Rus, newcomers from the north to India and Iran, knew snow, cold, they were familiar with birch, ash, beech, wolves, bears, horses.

It is known that the ancient Rus were called Aryans at that time - this is how they are recorded in Indian texts. It is also known that it was not the local Hindus who gave them this name, but that it was a self-name. Convincing evidence of this has been preserved in hydronymy and toponymy - the Ariyka River, the villages of Upper Ariy and Lower Ariy in the Perm region, in the very heart of the Ural civilization of cities, etc.

First monument Indian epic, which talks about the appearance of the Aryans, was written down four hundred years later, in the 11th century BC, and in the 3rd century BC, the ancient Indian literary language Sanskrit, surprisingly similar to the modern Russian language, was formed in its completed form.

Now men of the Russian genus R1a1 make up 16% of the total male population of India, and in the upper castes there are almost half of them - 47%, which indicates the active participation of the Aryans in the formation of the Indian aristocracy (the second half of the men of the upper castes are represented by local tribes, mainly Dravidian).

Unfortunately, information on the ethnogenetics of the Iranian population is not yet available, but the scientific community is unanimous in its opinion about the Aryan (that is, Russian) roots of ancient Iranian civilization. The ancient name of Iran is Arian, and the Persian kings loved to emphasize their Aryan origin, as eloquently evidenced, in particular, by the popular name Darius. This means that there were Russians there in ancient times.

Another wave of representatives of the R1a1 genus went south and reached the Arabian Peninsula, the Gulf of Oman, where Qatar, Kuwait, and the United Arab Emirates are now located. The Arabs there, having received the results of DNA testing, look with amazement at the testing certificate with the haplotype and haplogroup R1a1.

And these certificates determine the boundaries of the area of ​​​​the campaigns of the ancient Aryans. The calculations below show that the times of these campaigns in Arabia are 4 thousand years ago.

Our ancestors migrated from the ethnic home not only to the east, to the Urals, and to the south, to India and Iran, but also to the west, to where European countries are now located.

In the western direction, geneticists have complete statistics: in Poland, holders of the Russian (Aryan) haplogroup R1a1 make up 57% of the male population, in Latvia, Lithuania, the Czech Republic and Slovakia - 40%, in Germany, Norway and Sweden - 18%, in Bulgaria - 12 %, and in England the least is 3%.

Unfortunately, there is so far no ethnogenetic information on the European patrimonial aristocracy, and therefore it is impossible to determine whether the share of ethnic Russians is evenly distributed across all social strata of the population or, as in India and, presumably, Iran, the Aryans made up the nobility in the lands where they came .

The only reliable evidence in favor latest version was a by-product of a genetic examination to establish the authenticity of the remains of the family of Nicholas II.
The Y chromosomes of the king and heir Alexei turned out to be identical to samples taken from their relatives from the English royal family.

This means that at least one royal house of Europe, namely the house of the German Hohenzollerns, of which the English Windsors are a branch, has Aryan roots.

However, Western Europeans (haplogroup R1b) are in any case our closest relatives, oddly enough, much closer than the Northern Slavs (haplogroup N) and the Southern Slavs (haplogroup I1b).

Our common ancestor with Western Europeans lived about 13 thousand years ago, at the end ice age, thousands five years before gathering began to develop into crop farming, and hunting into cattle breeding. That is, in the very gray Stone Age antiquity. And the Slavs are even further from us in blood.

The settlement of Russian-Aryans to the east, south and west (there was simply nowhere to go further to the north, and so, according to the Indian Vedas, before coming to India they lived near the Arctic Circle) became a biological prerequisite for the formation of a special language group, Indo-European.

These are almost all European languages, some languages ​​of modern Iran and India and, of course, the Russian language and ancient Sanskrit, which are closest to each other for the obvious reason - in time (Sanskrit) and in space (Russian language) they stand next to the original source, the Aryan proto-language , from which all other Indo-European languages ​​grew.

The above are irrefutable natural scientific facts, moreover, obtained by independent American scientists. Disputing them is the same as disagreeing with the results of a blood test in a clinic. They are not disputed. They are simply kept silent. They are hushed up unanimously and stubbornly, they are hushed up, one might say, completely. And there are reasons for this.

The first such reason is quite trivial and boils down to scientific false solidarity. Too many theories, concepts and scientific reputations will have to be refuted if they are revised in the light of the latest discoveries of ethnogenetics.

For example, we will have to rethink everything that is known about the Tatar-Mongol invasion of Rus'. The armed conquest of peoples and lands was always and everywhere accompanied at that time by the mass rape of local women. Traces in the form of Mongolian and Turkic haplogroups should have remained in the blood of the male part of the Russian population.

But they are not there! Solid R1a1 and nothing more, the purity of the blood is amazing. This means that the Horde that came to Rus' was not at all what is commonly thought of it; if the Mongols were present there, it was in statistically insignificant numbers, and who was called “Tatars” is generally unclear. Well, which scientist will refute scientific foundations, supported by mountains of literature and great authorities?!

No one wants to spoil relationships with colleagues and be branded an extremist by destroying established myths. In an academic environment, this happens all the time - if the facts do not correspond to the theory, so much the worse for the facts.

The second reason, incomparably more significant, relates to the sphere of geopolitics. The history of human civilization appears in a new and completely unexpected light, and this cannot but have serious political consequences.

Throughout modern history, the pillars of European scientific and political thought proceeded from the idea of ​​Russians as barbarians who had recently climbed down from the trees, backward by nature and incapable of creative work.

And suddenly it turns out that the Russians are the same Aryans who had a decisive influence on the formation of great civilizations in India, Iran and Europe itself. That Europeans owe a lot to Russians for their prosperous lives, starting with the languages ​​they speak.

It is no coincidence that in recent history, a third of the most important discoveries and inventions belong to ethnic Russians in Russia itself and abroad. It is no coincidence that the Russian people were able to repel the invasions of the united forces of continental Europe led by Napoleon and then Hitler. And so on.

It is no coincidence that behind all this there is a great historical tradition, thoroughly forgotten over many centuries, but remaining in the collective subconscious of the Russian people and manifesting itself whenever the nation faces new challenges.

Manifesting itself with iron inevitability due to the fact that it grew on a material, biological basis in the form of Russian blood, which remains unchanged for four and a half millennia.

It is very important to know this and, through the prism of knowledge, to evaluate current events, words and actions of people, to determine one’s own place in the history of the great biosocial phenomenon called the “Russian nation.”

Knowledge of the history of a people obliges a person to try to be at the level of the great achievements of his ancestors, and this is the worst thing for the enemies of the Russian nation. That's why they try to hide this knowledge. And we will try to make it publicly available.

"Genetic code Russian person" - Boris Karlov http://community.livejournal.com/ru_politics/34385021.html

Reviews

Thank you, Sergey, for a very interesting publication.
Lydia Lyubomirskaya has an equally interesting publication in her diary on stichera.
And it is interesting because it describes in detail the settlement of peoples by blood, the signs of which you use.
And all this was in the memory of our people and scientifically confirmed.