Prepare a comparative description of troekur senior Dubrovsky classes. Comparison of Troekurov and Dubrovsky (senior). Father and daughter

One of best works A. S. Pushkin is the novel “Dubrovsky,” written in the adventure genre. In this work, the author gives a number of vivid images characteristic of the 19th century. One of them is Kirila Petrovich Troekurov.

Ardent disposition and rather limited mind

That's exactly what we can say about the hero briefly. The eldest Troekurov is a gentleman, of old upbringing, a retired general. He is a rich and famous widower throughout the area, who is raising an adult daughter of marriageable age. They are afraid of him. People around him begin to worry as soon as they hear his first or last name. They please him in the most insignificant whims, because they are afraid of incurring the wrath of the all-powerful landowner Troekurov.

Kirila Petrovich himself takes this behavior of others for granted. It shouldn’t be any other way, he believes. There are no differences for him; he behaves arrogantly with everyone. Without bothering anyone with his attention and visits, he demands the opposite of himself. He should be the center, all the attention of others should be directed to him.
This is a spoiled, proud and perverted person. The author embodied in his image all the vices of human dementia. Troekurov’s description is a description of a man with a short mind who cannot restrain his ardent disposition and bad habits.

Troekurov is allowed everything and he knows nothing is denied. He allows himself to treat others with disrespect. But his servants are devoted to him, as they understand his position well: Troekurov’s estate is the richest in the area, and the master himself enjoys unlimited power.

Relationship with Andrei Gavrilovich Dubrovsky

Troekurov despises, humiliates those around him, and tries every time to show his superiority. However, in his relationship with the elder Dubrovsky, Troekurov’s character is shown differently. This independent, poor landowner evokes a feeling of respect in him. They had known each other for a long time, served together, became widowers almost simultaneously, each raised a child. Dubrovsky – the only person who could afford to express own opinion under Troyekurov.
But when Andrei Gavrilovich tries to point out that people live in Troekurov’s house worse than dogs, the all-powerful master gets angry and begins to take revenge, choosing the most terrible way - to illegally take away his estate, crush his neighbor, forcing him to humiliate himself and submit to his power. Nothing is impossible for him because he is rich. He is not concerned about the moral side of the action.
His temper is known to everyone, and when it subsided a little, and the landowner decided to forgive ex-friend, it turned out to be too late. In an instant, the wayward and power-hungry master Troekurov managed to destroy destinies.

Father and daughter

The characterization of Troekurov from the novel “Dubrovsky” in his relationship with his daughter Masha is no less clearly revealed. Even despite his love for her, he makes no exceptions, treating his daughter the same as others. He is harsh and capricious, at some moments cruel, so Masha does not trust him with her feelings and experiences. She grew up reading books, which managed to replace communication with her cruel father.

The main goal of his life is wealth and he tries to get it in any way. Deciding to give his daughter as a wife to an old man who has a lot of money and power, he stops at nothing. Masha's happiness means nothing to her father - the main thing is to be rich and powerful.

The image of Troekurov in the novel “Dubrovsky” indicates the majority of human vices. This is callousness of the soul, and dementia, and depravity, and immoderate lust for power and greed.
But not everything in life is valued by wealth. Troyekurov’s story is instructive and the author makes you think about one simple truth, which was voiced by the priest at the beginning of the novel, at the funeral of Dubrovsky the elder: “Vanity of vanities... and they will sing to Kiril Petrovich eternal memory... will the funeral be richer ... but does God care!

Work test

The collected works of our beloved poet and writer Alexander Sergeevich Pushkin total more than 10 volumes. "Dubrovsky" is a novel known to us since school years. Wide in scope and deep in psychological content, it touches the soul of every reader. The main characters of the novel are Troekurov and Dubrovsky. We will study the main characters, as well as the main events of the work in more detail.

Russian gentleman

The action in the novel takes place in the 19th century. It is described in sufficient detail in the works of many classics of that time. As you know, in those days there was serfdom. The peasants, or souls as they were also called, were owned by the nobles.

The Russian master, the arrogant Kirila Petrovich Troekurov, was very much in awe of him. Not only his serf wards, but also many officials were in awe of him.

Troekurov's lifestyle left much to be desired: he spent his days idly, often drank and suffered from gluttony.

The peasants were in awe of him, and he, in turn, treated them rather capriciously, showing his complete dominance over them.

Troekurov's favorite pastime was mockery and ridicule of animals and people. Suffice it to recall the bear who rolled a barrel with protruding nails and was angry from the pain. This made the master laugh. Or the scene with the bear that was chained in a small room. Anyone who entered it was attacked by the poor animal. Troekurov took pleasure in the fury of the bear and human fear.

Humble Nobleman

Troekurov and Dubrovsky, whose comparative characteristics will be considered in detail by us, are very different people. Andrei Gavrilovich was honest, valiant, calm in character, he was strikingly different from his comrade. Once upon a time, the elder Dubrovsky and Troekurov were colleagues. But the careerist Kirila Petrovich, betraying his honor, took the side of the new tsar, which is how he earned himself high rank. Andrei Gavrilovich, who remained devoted to his ruler, ended his service as a humble lieutenant. But nevertheless, the relationship between Troekurov and Dubrovsky was quite friendly and mutually respectful. They often met, visited each other's estates, and had conversations.

Both heroes had similar fates: they began serving together, were widowed early, and had a child to raise. But life took them in different directions.

Argument

There were no signs of trouble. But one day the relationship between Troekurov and Dubrovsky cracked. The phrase expressed by Kirila Petrovich’s clerk greatly offended Andrei Gavrilovich. The serf said that Troekurov’s slaves lived better than some nobles. This meant, of course, the modest Dubrovsky.

Immediately after this he left for his estate. Kirila Petrovich ordered to return it, but Andrei Gavrilovich did not want to come back. Such insolence offended the master, and he decided to achieve his goal at all costs.

A comparison of Dubrovsky and Troekurov will be incomplete without describing the method by which Kirila Petrovich decided to take revenge on his comrade.

Insidious plan

Having no influence on Dubrovsky, Troekurov conceived a terrible idea - to take away his friend’s estate. How dare he disobey him! Undoubtedly, this was very cruel to an old acquaintance.

Were Troekurov and Dubrovsky real friends? A comparative description of these heroes will help you figure this out.

Kirila Petrovich bribed officials indiscriminately and forged papers. Dubrovsky, having learned about the legal battle, remained quite calm, because he was confident of his absolute innocence.

Shabashkin, hired by Troekurov, took care of all the dirty deeds, although he knew that the Kistenevka estate legally belonged to the Dubrovskys. But everything turned out differently.

Scene in court

And now that exciting hour has come. Having met at the courthouse, Troekurov and Dubrovsky (whose comparative assessment will be given by us later) behaved proudly and walked into the courtroom. Kirila Petrovich felt very at ease. He already felt the taste of victory. Dubrovsky, on the contrary, behaved very calmly, stood leaning against the wall and was not worried at all.

The judge began reading a long decision. When it was all over, there was silence. Dubrovsky was completely bewildered. At first he was silent for some time, and then he became furious and forcefully pushed away the secretary who invited him to sign the papers. He began to rave, shouting something loudly about kennels and dogs. With difficulty they sat him down and took him home on a sleigh.

The triumphant Troekurov did not expect such a turn of events. Seeing his former comrade in a terrible state, he became upset and even stopped celebrating his victory over him.

Andrei Gavrilovich was taken home, where he became ill. He spent more than one day under the supervision of a doctor.

Repentance

The comparison of Dubrovsky and Troekurov is based on the complete opposition of the heroes. Kirila Petrovich, so arrogant and domineering, and Andrei Gavrilovich, kind and honest man, were unable to continue their communication for long. But still, after the court hearing, Troekurov’s heart thawed. He decided to go to his former friend and talk.

However, he had no idea that by that time Vladimir, his son, was already in the house of Dubrovsky Sr.

Seeing Kirila Petrovich arriving in the window, the shocked Andrei Gavrilovich could not bear it and died suddenly.

Troekurov was never able to explain the reason for his arrival, and he was never able to repent to his friend for the crime he had committed.

And here the novel changes its turn: Vladimir decides to take revenge on the enemy for his father.

The appearance of Vladimir

It is worth saying a few words about the personality of this young man. Left without a mother early, the boy was in the care of his father. At the age of twelve he was sent to the cadet corps, and then continued his military studies at a higher institution. The father spared no expense in raising his son and provided for him well. But the young man spent his time in carousing and card games, had large debts. Now that he is left completely alone, and even practically homeless, he feels severe loneliness. He had to grow up quickly and change his life dramatically.

Troekurov and Vladimir Dubrovsky become fierce enemies. The son is thinking over a plan of revenge against his father's offender.

When the estate was taken away and came into the possession of Kirila Petrovich, Vladimir was left without a livelihood. He has to become a robber in order to earn a living. Beloved by his serfs, he was able to gather a whole team of like-minded people. They rob rich people, but avoid Troekurov's estate. He undoubtedly thinks that the young man is afraid of him, so he does not go to him with robbery.

Troekurov in the novel “Dubrovsky” showed himself to be a proud man, but at the same time he is afraid that Vladimir will one day come to take revenge on him.

Dubrovsky in Troekurov's house

But our young hero turned out to be not so simple. He unexpectedly appears at the estate of Kirila Petrovich. But no one knows him there - he has not been to his homeland for many years. After exchanging documents with the French teacher and paying him well, Vladimir introduces himself to the Troekurov family as teacher Deforge. He speaks French well, and no one can suspect Dubrovsky in him.

Maybe, young man He would be able to bring all his plans for revenge to life, but one circumstance prevents him - love. Unexpectedly for himself, Vladimir is fascinated by Masha, the daughter of his enemy Troekurov.

This love changes the lives of all the characters in the novel. Now Dubrovsky Jr. doesn’t want revenge at all. He renounces evil thoughts in the name of his beloved woman. But Masha still doesn’t know who this Deforge really is.

Troekurov himself began to respect the young Frenchman and was proud of his courage and modesty. But the time has come, and Vladimir confesses to Masha about his feelings and who he really is. The girl is confused - her father will never allow them to be together.

When Kirila Petrovich finds out the truth, he resolves the issue radically - he marries his daughter to the rich Prince Vereisky against her wishes.

Vladimir does not have time to arrive at the church during the wedding, and now she is no longer his Mashenka, but Princess Vereiskaya. Vladimir has no choice but to go far. Kirila Petrovich is more than satisfied with the current situation.

Conclusion

Troekurov and Dubrovsky, whose comparative characteristics are presented in detail by us, are completely different types of heroes. It cannot be said that Kirila Petrovich was a terrible person - he nevertheless repented of his vile act. But life did not give him a chance to be forgiven.

Both Andrei and Vladimir Dubrovsky are very ambitious. The serfs respect them, and they, in turn, do not oppress them in any way. However, Pushkin teaches us all: no circumstances should lead to extreme measures. Friendship is more than just communication, and you need to be able to value it.

Troekurov	Dubrovsky
Character quality	Negative hero	The main positive hero
Character	Spoiled, selfish, promiscuous.	Noble, generous, decisive. Has a hot character. A person who knows how to love not for money, but for the beauty of the soul.
Occupation	A rich nobleman, he spends his time in gluttony, drunkenness, and leads a dissolute life. Humiliation of the weak brings him great pleasure.	Has a good education, served cornet in the guard. After Troekurov illegally took away the estate from Dubrovsky Sr., he becomes a robber.
Position in society	A wealthy nobleman with great connections and money.	Noble robber, former nobleman.
Attitude to the quarrel with Dubrovsky's father	He couldn’t forgive his friend and begins to take revenge with full force. Having money, he managed to seize the estate from the Dubrovskys with the help of bribes.	He considers harming his offender to be an extreme baseness. Having fallen in love with Troekurov’s daughter Maria, he renounces “bloody” revenge.
The purpose of visiting Andrei Dubrovsky before his death	The desire to apologize for what you have done and make amends.	Say goodbye to your father and send him on his last journey.
Relation to Masha	Troekurov adores his daughter, but makes her unhappy by giving her in marriage to a rich old man, Prince Vereisky.	Despite the fact that Masha is the daughter of Troekurov, the Dubrovskys’ worst enemy, Andrei falls in love with her and decides to marry her.
Attitude towards possible alliance Vladimir and Masha	Extremely negative.	Dubrovsky is very worried. He loves Maria, but she will become the wife of a robber. And such a husband is unworthy of her.
Attitude towards serfs	He considers them just slaves, a material object that can be easily changed.	Understand that serfs are people too. In the end he releases his peasants to freedom.
Life streak	Troekurov gets away with everything. This is not surprising, because with great connections and wealth you can move mountains.	Evil conquers good. Noble Dubrovsky loses the “battle” due to a stronger enemy. Dubrovsky cannot find a place in this life where he would be happy.
Relation to Misha the bear	After killing Misha, she does not regret his death at all. He even admires young Dubrovsky.	Doesn't express much sympathy for the beast. As a result, he sneaks into T.’s house and kills Misha.
Ending	Masha is married to a rich nobleman, Troekurov’s life is going well.	His departure not only means his loss, but also symbolizes the defeat of all of Russia. All good qualities people disappear from Russia, only the worst remains and continues to live happily ever after.

Comparison of Andrei Dubrovsky and Kirila Troekurov

We cannot imagine Russian literature without the poet and prose writer Alexander Sergeevich Pushkin, the founder of the realistic movement. Every person, having familiarized himself with the writer’s work, does not remain indifferent to his creations. One of the classic masterpieces is the novel "Dubrovsky". When writing, Pushkin was guided by the truthful story of Pavel Voinovich Nashchokin, who was a close friend of the writer.

In this novel, Pushkin touched on topics that worried many in those years: the lack of rights of serfs, the permissiveness of rich landowners, the injustice of the royal court and robbery as a protest of the common people.

The essence of the plot of the novel is about how a conflict arises between two landowners Kirill Troekurov and Andrei Dubrovsky after many years of friendship. The wealthy landowner Troekurov allowed his huntsman to make a free statement, in which he offended the honor and dignity of his friend Dubrovsky. The matter comes to trial. Due to the false testimony of the legislator Spitsyn, the estate of Andrei Gavrilovich Kistenevka goes to Kirill Petrovich. Dubrovsky was already not living on a grand scale, leading a modest lifestyle compared to Troekurov. And then such a disaster - his best friend takes all his property. Severe nervous shock affects Andrei Gavrilovich’s health. He is struck by an illness that leads to death. Vladimir, son of Andrei Dubrovsky, leaves military service due to his father's illness and returns home. Having learned all the circumstances that have developed with his father’s estate, he cannot stand it and sets his house on fire. In this case, the clerks die. He becomes a robber with one desire to take revenge on his father's former friend.

Kirill Troekurov is one of the main characters of the novel. Very rich. A strong, strong man. Despite his lack of education, he has great influence in secular circles, which allows him to do whatever he wants. To achieve his goals, he shamelessly allows himself to lie. He respects only wealthy people, and expresses clear disdain for the poor.

Andrei Dubrovsky is not a rich man, but with self-esteem. By origin he belongs to a noble family. Proud, independent. For him, having a thick wallet does not matter when communicating with people. Honest, direct. Not afraid to express his opinion. Believes that justice will always prevail. But, unfortunately, Russia at that time lived according to Troekurov’s laws. And all of it positive qualities They don’t save his life.

6th grade. Characteristics and comparison

A friendship that ended never really began.

Pushkin A.S. - a person to be proud of. We should be grateful to him that we can enjoy the great works of this unique writer. He is the heritage of our Motherland. “Dubrovsky” is one of many novels by A.S. Pushkin. The plot of the novel is based on real events, which makes it more exciting and touching.

At the center of the work are two people, Kirila Troekurov and Andrei Dubrovsky. With the help of these heroes, A.S. Pushkin showed the problems noble society And human qualities, characteristic of the noble class of that time.

Kirila Petrovich Troekurov and Andrei Gavrilovich Dubrovsky are characters of the same age, belonging to the noble class, and therefore received the same upbringing. They had little similarity in character and inclinations. Fate, in the beginning life path, also developed the same way. Both have a love marriage behind them, early widowhood and small children in their arms. But despite this, these characters are completely different in temperament and goals in life.

Troekurov is a character with a “rather limited mind.” A.S. Pushkin collected in one person all the terrible vices of humanity. Kirila Petrovich considers himself the center of the universe, he is used to everyone being afraid of him. He doesn't know what failure is. He has the power that can open all doors for him. His fiery personality spreads to everyone. He doesn't know who's in front of him. His name alone terrifies people. They experience insurmountable fear; people don’t even think about contradicting it. Everyone, on the contrary, tries to please him even if it goes against the law. He is the law itself. One word from him can destroy a person. Troyekurov is a tyrant. His cruel attitude extends to his servants, despite their devotion to him. His hobbies are primitive: gluttony and drunkenness. Kirila Petrovich does not spare her only daughter, she does not marry her out of love.

Troekurov respected only one person. It was Andrei Gavrilovich Dubrovsky. They were once united by service in the guard. Then the friends' paths diverged and they met years later. Dubrovsky was ruined and forced to leave service. Andrei Gavrilovich settled not far from Kiril Petrovich, who “offered him his protection.” But Dubrovsky chose to remain poor and independent. Pride prevailed over the fear of venturing out into the world.

Dubrovsky was the only one who could express his opinion under Troekurov. This is what destroyed him. Andrei Gavrilovich could not stand the insult from the kennel worker towards him. Pride and temper took over. Andrei silently left the estate. Troekurov and did not return after a serf was sent for him. After another mistake was made, Dubrovsky demanded that Troekurov send him the employee who had insulted him. For which his now former friend decided to take away Dubrovsky’s estate. Troekurov wanted unconditional power over Dubrovsky.

The tragedy of this novel lies in the fact that Troekurov realized his mistake too late. He decides to make peace with his friend and return his estate, but it was already too late. Dubrovsky dies.

A.S. Pushkin showed with his novel how easy it is to destroy another person. To do this you need to have money and be dishonest person. Unfortunately, nothing has changed and today you can meet a person with the same vices as the character in this novel.

Several interesting essays

Essay My favorite writer Lermontov
I like many works of Russian and foreign literature. Despite the impressive list of great writers of all times and peoples, for myself personally, I have long chosen my favorite writer - M.Yu. Lermontov
Essay based on Avilov’s painting Duel of Peresvet with Chelubey (Duel on the Kulikovo Field) description
One of greatest creations outstanding Russian and Soviet painter Mikhail Ivanovich Avilov’s painting is The Duel on the Kulikovo Field. This painting brought real fame and success to the artist.
The image and characteristics of the Gentleman from San Francisco in Bunin's story
In his work I.A. Bunin tells the story of a certain gentleman from San Francisco traveling to Europe with his wife and daughter. A family sails on a steamship with a symbolic name
Essay Letter to a Veteran of the Great Patriotic War Letter of Gratitude
Hello, dear veteran, participant in the battles of the Great Patriotic War! I am writing to you to express my deep gratitude for what you have done for us - future generations.
Essay Anna Pogudko in the novel Quiet Don: image and characteristics
IN famous novel Sholokhov " Quiet Don“Cossack women are those people who do not pay attention to political passions. The novel contains the image of a revolutionary woman, Anna Pogudko.

In A. S. Pushkin’s novel “Dubrovsky”, two characters are opposed to each other - Kirila Troekurov, who is presented as a negative character, and Andrei Dubrovsky, he is a positive character.

Dubrovsky and Troekurov were best friends. They have a lot in common - both belong to the noble class, both were widowed with children. And their temper is hot, ardent and impatient, which leads them to hostility and disastrous consequences.

The two friends also have differences. Kirila Troekurov is a rich tyrant who spends his time in idleness and pleasure. He does not consider his serfs to be people, but they are still loyal to him. Troekurov realizes his power and superiority. He is the owner of many estates. The master's arrogance was transmitted to his servants. One of them allows himself outrageous insolence towards Dubrovsky, thereby causing enmity between him and his master. In the heat of anger, Troekurov sued the estate from his former friend. Andrey fell ill from severe grief.

Troekurov, when he cooled down, realized what he had done. He comes to Dubrovsky to ask for forgiveness and correct what he has done. But Andrei’s son, Vladimir Dubrovsky, did not even let him close to his father.

In contrast to Troekurov, Andrei Dubrovsky is a noble and decent person. He is straightforward and does not flatter his rich friend, unlike other nobles. Dubrovsky boldly expresses his opinion. He is disgusted by the behavior of his old friend and his cruel attitude towards the serfs. Being a fair man, he is deeply offended by the lack of respect for himself. Troekurov’s base act after their quarrel became a strong blow for him, which leads him to death.

Andrei Dubrovsky instilled in his son eternal values and features noble man. He treated his servants and serfs kindly, never offended them, and they in return prayed for their master.

In his work, A. S. Pushkin demonstrates how destructive power and money are and how low a person can fall if he cannot control himself.