!! Thus, we came to the same low price, which cannot be for a good animal, and which should scare, not inspire confidence!!! Thus we come to

The trust that my friend felt in relation to the amount of 28 thousand rubles for a kitten in a pet store is essentially due only to the fact that the price has artificially increased, because the intermediary (pet store) increases the price more than twice in order to receive his own income from deals!

I think in 2017 everyone already knows why a Maine Coon kitten of good breeding and good maintenance cannot cost 10,000 rubles, but just in case, I’ll tell you about this:

An animal from a nursery cannot be cheap, because its maintenance is expensive.

Breeders are engaged in business, not charity, they will not sell pets for less than they spent on raising and maintaining this animal!

Raising producers (parents of kittens – feeding, veterinary care),
- exhibition fees (fees, expenses for travel to other cities, the cost of exhibition examination, the cost of veterinary control, without exhibitions and assessments there will be no titles and titles, and therefore no admission to breeding and breed for kittens born from this breeding animal) ,
- high-quality feeding with professional feeds,
- kitten health (vaccinations, veterinary care),
- nursery equipment (in nurseries, as a rule, there are not 1-2 cats, but 10-20, in order to keep such a number of animals efficiently and comfortably, you need to equip an apartment/house for this),
- consumables (trays, bowls, diapers, litter for the tray).

Add up the accrued expenses for the items I have listed and you will understand that if someone sells a kitten with a breed for 10,000 rubles, then he either
a) a Samaritan working at a disadvantage, afraid that this breed will die out
b) spent less than 10 thousand on the maintenance of this animal (which means he did not spend money on quality food, did not vaccinate, the parents do not have titles and permission to breed, the kittens never saw a veterinarian, but were born without permission from the left cat and all their short life spent on a budget in a cage on newspapers).

COMPLIANCE WITH THE DECLINED BREED.
DOCUMENTS.

Even in the pet store, the sellers persistently hinted to me several times that the metric that comes with Ekaterina is a piece of paper without meaning, but the pedigree, which I can separately buy from the breeder, is a sacred document with which I will be much better off living, especially if I am planning a pregnancy for my kitten.

I called the phone number indicated in the metric, at the other end of the line I was answered by a man who has no idea what kind of kitten I have, where I bought it, what breed it is, what club/kennel it is from, since he deals with many documents at once for animals.
But he promised that a woman who could help me obtain a pedigree would call me back.

I called back.
In personal communication with this woman, I was forced to continue my acting game of a cute dummy boy so that the woman would not suspect anything and so that I could get the pedigree and check it, include it in my article.
Therefore, to my great regret, I never told this boorish, obscene, vile chicken everything that I thought about her (I was afraid of scaring her away).

Excuse me for my emotions, but I won’t have another opportunity to speak.

The woman talked to me as if she had long ago borrowed me a large sum of money, and I, such a bastard, brazenly did not pay it back, and I was also trying to get into a new debt.

She was constantly confused about the cost of replacing the metric with a pedigree (either 2 thousand rubles, then 3, then generally 5, I got the impression that she would like me to name the maximum amount by which I can be heated, otherwise suddenly she will name less than I am willing to give).

The woman, by an amazing coincidence, also lives in Lyubertsy, not far from the “breeder” who produced “Ekaterina”, and she is very busy with important club affairs (which she mentioned only a word), so she could not meet me. It would be easier for her if I sent her the money (we agreed on 3,000 rubles) in advance, and then, in her free time from important club affairs, she would send me the pedigree by Russian Post.
I had to lie that I also live in Lyubertsy, that I have a personal car, and that it would not be difficult for me to drive up to her at any time of the day or night if she had at least 30 free minutes.
This proposal seemed to offend her, she began to lament that in this case I would need to take Ekaterina with me so that she, as the director of the club, would evaluate her and, I quote, “I will also think about whether to give her a pedigree, in case she is defective or not.” our".
I said that I had a metric in my hands, a receipt from the pet store, an agreement with the pet store and there could be no mistake, so I could take Ekaterina with me for an assessment without any problems.

The lady agreed, gritting her teeth.

We agreed to meet on February 17 at 19:00 near the gate of her private house. My personal car and my wife that day was Victoria, the owner of Valerie’s cat (another heroine of my blog).
The fact that we live in Lyubertsy is a lie; we drove 30 km there, and due to the ever-changing Moscow traffic jams (sometimes empty, sometimes thick) we were 15 minutes late.
At 18:59, screaming hysterically into the phone, the club director said that if we weren’t there in 1 minute, then she was leaving for Moscow on important club business, but not having the ability to teleport and not being able to reach the woman who hung up, we just We silently arrived at the house at 19:15.
About 5 minutes later, some silent man, without opening the fence, pushed the pedigree through the window to us and we, without ever unpacking Ekaterina from the carrier, went back home.
What’s funny is that no one took the metric from us (although we were talking about exchanging the metric for the pedigree).

This is the “document” I finally received:

I won’t pull the cat by the tail and will immediately show you a comment from a real club that is part of the federation on the topic of Catherine’s pedigree:

1) The cat is registered at a dog kennel

2) The pedigree number is from 2016, but it was issued in 2017 - this does not happen

3) There are many representatives of bearers of “silver” titles and there is not a single descendant with “silver”

4) Suddenly, out of nowhere, colors appear that their ancestors did not have
5) In the LionKun nursery (a real nursery) there are no and never have been the sires from whom Ekaterina’s father was born, and Ekaterina’s father himself is not there

6) Ekaterina’s mother from the KANSF nursery (even from the name it is clear that KANSF is the Canadian Sphynx nursery)

7) One of the ancestors of “Cat Lady Di Krasny Dar” (real cattery) – never born in the Krasny Dar cattery, again a fake

A small and not entirely competent (what I remembered from the words of professionals) explanation about the pedigree:

All Maine Coons once upon a time descended from someone, there were the first pairs of sires.
Bloodlines, real bloodlines, can be traced back to these very pioneers. Yes, an incredible many years and generations have passed, but then clubs and federations work to preserve the breed.
That is, a pedigree is not only the number of ancestors that fits on one document of one animal. Having reached the most extreme ancestors of the “great-great-great-great-grandmothers”, the pedigree does not end, it simply flows into another, older pedigree, and so on until it reaches the origins - to the very first Maine Coons, with which the breed began.

Catherine’s pedigree does not end with anything and does not lead to anything, at least due to the fact that out of nowhere colors appeared that were not among the ancestors (which means they bred the wrong animals that were indicated), at most - because some animals from her pedigree does not exist at all.

It turns out that there is no evidence that Ekaterina is a purebred Maine Coon!

If, paying 20,000 - 80,000 thousand rubles in a pet store for an animal, you want to get a purebred breed - do not rely on it. Mixed breeds from breeders are sold there.

The owner of a real federated Maine Coon kennel agreed to provide a real pedigree of a real Maine Coon for this article ( distinctive feature from Ekaterina’s pedigree is that by entering the numbers/names of these animals into Google or turning to professionals, you will in any case find these animals, their parents, and the pages of their nurseries):

WHERE TO GO THEN TO BUY A HEALTHY PURE-BRED KITTEN WITH A BREED?

To the nursery/breeder! There are no other options at all!

There are many articles on the Internet about how to distinguish a Breeder from a “breeder”, so I will briefly list the main points:

Respectable breeders never sell their kittens through pet stores, in markets, in passages (they value their work, love their pets, and will not allow a pet store employee to sell a kitten to a person who behaves the way I behaved in the pet store when buying Ekaterina );

Decent kittens cannot be cheap (their cost - maintenance, raising and care is expensive), however, as we found out in the example of Ekaterina, a high price is also not a guarantee of quality;

Respectable breeders talk not only about the merits of their animals, but also about the shortcomings, a lot about the shortcomings, because each breed has its own characteristics in keeping, the breeder warns about them, so that later the animal sold to him is not thrown out into the street, because it turned out to be “not like that”;

NO INDEPENDENT CLUBS!
The nursery must be registered with the club, and the club must be registered in the felinological system/federation (the most common are CFA, TICA, FIFE, MFA, WCF);

A decent breeder will never sell suckling/two-month-old kittens; cats are sold at the age of 4 months;

A real breeder will have no problem answering any questions about his nursery, about the club in which the nursery is a member, about the felinological system in which the club is a member, he will not be offended by these questions, because he has nothing to hide;

The breeder will never “sell” a kitten “if only they would buy it sooner”, will not rush into a decision, or unreasonably lower the price;

The breeder will be happy to invite you to visit his nursery so that you can evaluate the conditions in which the animals live (cleanliness, smell, sociability of the pets);

Kittens from decent nurseries ALWAYS HAVE DOCUMENTS (even if the animal is already neutered), documents confirm the breed, no documents - no breed.
The phrase “with documents it will be more expensive” is a deception, and a very stupid one, since registration of a birth certificate or pedigree for a breeder costs a penny;

A decent breeder, unfortunately for some people (like my friend mentioned above), will always be interested in future fate his graduate, and will definitely conclude an agreement. However, I believe that it is not right to be afraid of the contract, because it PROTECTS YOU, in case of any problems with the animal (an identified disease that the breeder kept silent about), you will be able to go to court and you will have a document in your hands confirming the fact of purchase (the same agreement).

RESULT.

For 22,500 rubles (+3000 pedigree) I bought it at a pet store

A sick animal with a long list of diagnoses, which he treated for two months and which, perhaps, will affect the duration and quality of life of the pet in the future (but Ekaterina’s last trips to the doctor are a completely different story, not for this article, but for the blog );

A total of about 25,000 rubles(!!!);

The animal was asocial, cowardly and aggressive out of fear, it took a month of daily work (communication) to adapt and socialize, this behavior caused inconvenience to me, my family and sometimes my neighbors (when she screamed loudly in fear);

Catherine does not have any breed, since there is nothing to confirm her origin;

With this purchase I did not save Ekaterina’s life (someone would have bought her anyway), but I supported the criminal (from a moral point of view) business of selling “living goods”, because both the store and the “breeder”, getting what they deserve (money) understand, that people need animals, and buys/produces even more of them.

I draw your attention - I wasn’t specifically looking for a sick or aggressive animal, and I wasn’t looking for a “worse” store.
Everything was calculated by chance, the experiment was carried out honestly!
This is the first kitten I came across and liked in the first pet store I came across (but a chain and large one) in Moscow.

I will not change the world with this article. It is unlikely that there will be at least 1000 people who can fully read a 24-page Word text.

With this article I will not be able to defeat the system (business selling animals).

But this does not mean that nothing needs to be done!

I showed people what awaits them after buying an animal in a pet store, I will try to make sure that when they type “buy a kitten in a pet store” into Google, people come across this text and are warned!

I gave you the information, but it’s up to you to decide how to use it.

I hope that someday people will simply stop buying cats in pet stores, because only a lack of demand will prompt the managers of these very stores to stop selling them.

Thus, we came to a contradiction in that the light pulse appeared simultaneously at two rather distant points in space. This paradox is unsolvable within the framework of SRT and refutes our assumptions about the possibility of time dilation and the constancy of the speed of light in all inertial frames of reference. To eliminate unnecessary objections to this paradox, I immediately propose to consider this option: let observers 2 and 3 give a signal about this to observer 1 at the moment of receiving a light pulse. So, if observer 1 receives these signals simultaneously, then the light pulse was in two different places (which is generally absurd), and if not simultaneously, then either the speed of light in the observers’ reference systems was different, or clocks 2 and 3 for observer 1 were not running the same - both of these contradict the theory of relativity.

So, we can point to the first mistake of A. Einstein, who postulated the following somewhat strange statement: "The speed of light in a vacuum is constant and equal to c".

This postulate contradicts logic and common sense in the sense that it does not indicate in which actual reference system the propagation of light occurs, attributing absoluteness to the movement of light, while, according to natural concepts, all movement is relative.

Time dilation.

It would seem that if we have proven the relativity of the speed of light, then there is no need to talk about “time dilation,” especially since we have already considered an example where such an assumption led to a paradox.

On the other hand, if for someone the arguments presented were not convincing enough, then the analysis of time in relatively moving reference systems may turn out to be an additional argument.

Let's start with general thoughts about the very concept of "time". When do we use this concept? IN general case, when we want to correlate the duration of any processes or the duration of intervals between events, which is generally the same thing, since a process includes at least two events: the beginning of the process and its end. By observing the events taking place, we can always say which of them occurred earlier, which - later, and which at the same time. But this is completely insufficient when we want to plan events or identify patterns in ongoing processes. We need to agree on the same unit of time for everyone. Historically, this unit became the day, which in turn is divided into 24 hours, etc. It follows that when we talk about the simultaneity of two events, we mean that they occurred at the same moment when the Earth was in the same position in relation to the Sun.

STR states that two events that are simultaneous in one frame of reference are non-simultaneous in another frame moving relative to the first. For an observer moving relative to the Earth, this means that if two events in the Earth reference frame occurred simultaneously, then for him these events occurred in different positions Earth relative to the Sun. This statement is already absurd enough to draw conclusions from it.

For those who believe that it is unacceptable to judge time by the position of the Sun, I will give another example. Let's say a long rod is hit from opposite sides simultaneously with equal force. Thanks to the simultaneity of the blows, the rod remained in place. If you stand at the SRT positions, then for an observer moving along the rod, the impacts were not simultaneous, and the rod began to move after the first impact and stopped after the second impact. Is it necessary to comment on such statements?

Additionally

Technology of growing corn for grain
Corn is one of the main crops of modern world agriculture. This is a crop of versatile use and high yield. Around the world, about 20% of corn grain is used for food, 15-20% for technical purposes, and about two-thirds for feed. Corn is grown in...

Galaxy as a megaworld level
Relevance, goals and objectives of the answer to this test work will be subject to the following provisions. We are interested not only in the stellar population of the house in which we live. We are interested in both the architecture of this house and its size; interested in how its inhabitants are settled, where housing is cramped...

After reading this article you will learn how to write a conclusion.

You have written and you need to write a conclusion. Read on to find out how to do this...

The first thing to note is that general rule The optimal length of the conclusion is 2-3 pages.

You should start with this phrase: The goal and objectives set in the work have been fulfilled. In particular(further we write the goal and objectives that were defined in the introduction). ( For example: The purpose and objectives set in course work, are completed. The concept and features of civil legal relations are studied, the elements of civil legal relations are considered, the features of the classification of civil legal relations are studied, property and personal, relative and absolute, proprietary and obligatory legal relations are revealed. Brief conclusions).

So, we can conclude that...

The conducted research allows us to conclude...

So, to summarize, we can state the following: ....

In conclusion, we note that...

To summarize, we can say...

Summing up the analysis, it should be noted...

From all that has been said, it follows that...

Thus, we can conclude...

Therefore, we come to the conclusion...

...the work allows us to conclude that...

Page 4

simultaneously, in parallel.

Thus, we came to the following conclusions:

1. Techniques for interpreting legal norms are a set of means used to establish the content of legal norms. They include grammatical, logical, systematic, historical-political, special legal, teleological and functional interpretation.

2. Grammatical interpretation is a set of techniques aimed at understanding the morphological and syntactic structure of the text of the act, identifying the meaning of individual words and terms, and the grammatical meaning of the entire sentence.

3. Logical interpretation involves the use of laws and rules of logic to understand the true meaning of a norm, which sometimes does not coincide with its literal presentation.

4. Systematic interpretation is the study of a legal norm from the point of view of its relationship with other norms.

5. Historical and political interpretation consists of studying the historical situation of the publication of the act, the socio-economic and political factors that determined the emergence of the norm.

6. Social and legal interpretation is associated with the analysis of special terms, technical and legal means and methods of expressing the will of the legislator.

7. Teleological (target) interpretation is aimed at establishing the purposes of issuing legal acts.

8. Functional interpretation examines the factors and conditions in which the interpreted norm operates and is implemented.

Interpretive techniques should be used all together, and not each separately.

3. Results of interpretation of legal norms.

a) Complete clarity of meaning is a necessary result of interpretation.

Any legal norm, no matter how clear and clearly formulated, needs interpretation, since it is closely related to the constantly changing conditions of social life.

In the process of systematic interpretation, another norm regulating the same type of social relations may be discovered. In this case, they speak of the presence of conflicts between two or more legal acts, having one object of regulation. If there is

In case of conflict between norms, the following rules should be followed.

1. If conflicting norms come from different norm-setting bodies, then the norm coming from a higher body is subject to application;

2) if conflicting norms come from the same body, then the norm issued later is subject to application.

A possible result of using all methods of interpretation may be the ambiguity of the legal norm (vagueness, insufficient precision of a particular word or expression, ambiguity of the norm, incompleteness of the legal norm, contradiction within the norm itself).

When interpreting an unclear rule, it is especially important to familiarize yourself with its official regulatory explanation. But conclusions from additional materials should not contradict the text of the norm itself, should not eliminate the ambiguities of the norm by departing from its literal meaning. The criteria for the truth and correctness of interpretation are, ultimately, universal human practice. More specific criteria include legal practice, linguistic communication practice, and logical correctness.

b). Scope of interpretation

Usage in various ways interpretation allows the interpreter to correctly and fully identify the will of the legislator contained in the text normative act. But for legal practice, it is important to clarify the relationship between the true content of a topic and its textual expression, that is, interpretation by volume. It is a logical continuation and completion of understanding the content of legal norms. The basis for raising the question of the scope of interpretation of the law is that in a number of cases, as a result of understanding this norm, it turns out that its meaning is narrower or broader than its textual expression. The unity of language and thinking, words and concepts does not mean their identity. This gives rise to the inevitability of not only literal, but also in some cases widespread and restrictive interpretation. The interpretation of legal norms by scope is not independent in nature, but is a consequence of other methods of interpreting legal norms. Thus, interpretation by scope is not a method, but a result of interpretation.

c) Literal interpretation.

Literal (adequate) interpretation means full compliance of the verbal expression of the law with its actual meaning. In an ideal system of legislation as a source of law that accurately expresses the intentions and thoughts of the legislator, the text of the law is subject to literal interpretation.

d) Restrictive and general interpretation.

With a restrictive interpretation, the content of a rule of law turns out to be narrower than its textual expression.

With a broad interpretation, the content (meaning) of the interpreted norm turns out to be broader than its textual expression. List of cases

ev, requiring a general interpretation, is often accompanied by the expressions “etc.” , “and others.” But such an interpretation is possible without any indication of this in the law. When speaking about a widespread interpretation, this concept should be distinguished from the concept of a broad interpretation of the law. A broad interpretation of the law is its extension to cases that are not covered by the meaning of the rule of law and which the legislator, when creating the law, did not have in mind. Broad interpretation is the process of creating a new legal norm. It is, strictly speaking, no longer an interpretation.

Restrictive and pervasive types of interpretation are used as an exception, when the legislator’s thought has not been adequately embodied in the text of the normative act (or the text becomes outdated due to the development of social relations). These types of interpretation may arise when the legislator uses a term or expression of a broader or narrower scope compared to the scope of the concept that he had in mind. A broad or restrictive interpretation may arise from the systematic nature of the rules of law. These types of interpretation cannot be applied if it would lead to deterioration legal status the person in respect of whom the act of application of the legal norm is issued. The following is also not allowed: 1) broad interpretation of exhaustive lists;

2. restrictive interpretation of incomplete lists;

3) broad interpretation of sanctions;

3. general interpretation of provisions that constitute an exception to the general rule;

4. broad or restrictive interpretation of terms defined by legal definition.

The limit of restrictive and expansive interpretation is the text of the law in its full logical scope.

We have come to the conclusion that literal, restrictive and general interpretation is the result of the application of one or another method of interpretation. Usually the law is interpreted literally

(adequate). Restrictive and broad interpretation is used when there is a discrepancy between the content (meaning) of the interpreted norm and its textual expression, which is an exception to the general rule. Often these types of interpretation are the result of imperfect legislation, the presence of gaps in it, unclear wording, etc. But sometimes the legislator deliberately allows this possibility. The correct application of restrictive and broad interpretation in these cases helps to establish the true will of the legislator.

4. Explanation of the law.

a) Explanation of the rules of law.

Explanation of the rules of law, expressed both in the form of an official act and in the form of recommendations and advice that are not formally binding, constitutes the second side of interpretation. Interpretation – component application of the norm. Since citizens, legal entities, and government bodies act as law enforcers, they are all interpreters of norms. However, the legal meaning of the results of interpretation is different. If civil or legal entity to the best of his understanding and taking into account his own interests, interprets the norm in a certain way, such interpretation does not go beyond the boundaries of a specific legal relationship. If the interpretation of the norm is given by a specially authorized state body, then similar interpretation acquires special authority and becomes the standard of law enforcement.

Thus, we came to the conclusion that the state did not arise immediately, but as a result of the evolution of man and his thinking, based on the influence of not only objective, but also subjective reasons. The emergence of the state was an objective law, a consequence of the entire previous development of the primitive communal system: the separation of man from the animal world, the social division of labor, the growth of its productivity, the emergence of the family, private ownership of tools and means of production, the exploitation of fellow tribesmen and slaves, the property stratification of members of the tribe, clan and etc. However, all these factors would not have such significance now if behind this whole series historical events there was no split of society into antagonistic classes. The latter were not just large groups of people occupying an independent place in the system of social production.

The main thing was that, having irreconcilable interests in those conditions, waging a fierce struggle among themselves, they thereby called into question the very existence of civilization. Therefore, the emergence of the state as effective remedy the settlement of class clashes was a kind of salvation of humanity. After all, any internal or external dangers cause harm to society and endanger human life, undermine the fundamental basis of the state - its integrity, i.e. a certain political, economic, ideological, spiritual, social and geographical sovereign state. The punitive approach to resolving social disputes between classes of society as a universal means of their state legal regulation could not solve the problem because the subject of the dispute was deeper than the capabilities of the state. It was not so much legal as social, cultural, moral character; was constantly reproduced by subsequent generations, analyzed in various scientific theories, and reflected in the programs of political parties. Society had to grow to other methods of solving its problems, including between classes. The same legislative, executive, judicial bodies, which arose along with the state as part of its mechanism, could not immediately be the means of a non-forceful solution social conflicts. A lot of time will pass before people think about the principles of separation of powers, the independence of the court as the main arbiter of resolving social contradictions, etc. The attitude towards law and the law in the life of society will also change. Recognition of the primacy of law destroys any personal, class principles for regulating social contradictions.

LIST OF REFERENCES USED

1. Alekseev, S. S. et al. Theory of state and law. / S. S. Alekseev. - M.: Norma, 2007. – 482 p.

2. Vengerov, A. B. Theory of State and Law: Textbook for Law Schools. Ed. 6th/ A. B. Vengerov. - M.: Omega-L, 2009. - 608 p.

3. Kashanina, T. V. Origin of state and law: training manual by specialty: 021100 (030501) "Jurisprudence", 032700 (050402) "Jurisprudence" (teacher of law), 030505 (023100) "Law enforcement", 030500 (521400) "Jurisprudence (bachelor)"./ T. V. Kashanina. - M., 2012. – 357 p.

4. Komarov, S. A. General theory of state and law. / S. A. Komarov. – M.-SPb.: Publishing House of the Legal Institute, 2011. – 345 p.

5. Malko, A. V. Theory of state and law. Elementary course. Ed. 3rd, stereotype./ A. V. Malko, V. V. Nyrkov, K. V. Shundikov. - M.: KnoRus, 2013. - 240 p.

6. Marchenko, M. N. Sources of law: textbook / M. N. Marchenko. - M.: Mosk. state University named after M. V. Lomonosova, Legal. fact, 2008. - 759 p.

7. Matuzov, N. I. Theory of state and law. / N. I. Matuzov. - M.: Delo, 2009. – 450 p.

8. Marchenko, M. N. Sources of Russian law. Moscow State University. Legal Faculty / M. N. Marchenko. - M.: Prospekt, 2005. – 335 p.

9. Morozova, L. A. Theory of state and law./ L. A. Morozova. - M.: Eksmo, 2009. - 564 p.

10. General theory of state and law in 3 volumes. T.1, T.2, T.3 State./ ed. M. N. Marchenko. – M.: Moscow State University named after. Lomonosov. Legal Faculty, 2007. – 678 p.

11. Panov, Yu. N. Theory of state and law./ Yu. N. Panov. - Tver Institute of Ecology and Law, 2012. – 245 p.

12. Problems of the general theory of state and law./ under general. ed. V. S. Nersesyants. - M.: Norma, 2004. – 832 p.

13. Semennikova, L. I. Phenomenon of the East. Ancient world. The formation of modern European civilization./ L. I. Semennikova. – Bryansk, 1995.

14. Theory of state and law: textbook./ ed. A. S. Pigolkina, Yu. A. Dmitrieva. - M., 2012. - 613 p.

15. Frolova, E. A. Methodological foundations for distinguishing concepts of legal understanding / E. A. Frolova // State and Law. - 2013. - No. 4. - P. 63-73.

16. Marchenko, M. N. The myth about the formation of the world state and law in the conditions of globalization / M. N. Marchenko // Education and Society. - 2008. - No. 5. - P. 82-88.

Komarov, S. A. General theory of state and law. / S. A. Komarov. – M.-SPb.: Publishing House of the Legal Institute, 2011. - P. 277.

Vengerov, A. B. Theory of State and Law: Textbook for Law Schools. Ed. 6th/ A. B. Vengerov. - M.: Omega-L. 2009. - P. 69.

Komarov, S. A. General theory of state and law. / S. A. Komarov. – M.-SPb.: Publishing House of the Legal Institute, 2011. - P. 122.

Vengerov, A. B. Theory of State and Law: Textbook for Law Schools. Ed. 6th/ A. B. Vengerov. - M.: Omega-L, 2009. - P. 67.

Problems of the general theory of state and law./ under general. ed. V. S. Nersesyants. - M.: Norma, 2004. - P. 89.

Komarov, S. A. General theory of state and law. / S. A. Komarov. – M.-SPb.: Publishing House of the Legal Institute, 2011. - P. 111.

Problems of the general theory of state and law./ under general. ed. V. S. Nersesyants. - M.: Norma, 2004. - P. 90.

Problems of the general theory of state and law./ under general. ed. V. S. Nersesyants. - M.: Norma, 2004. - P. 89.

Marchenko, M. N. Sources of law: textbook / M. N. Marchenko. – M.: Moscow. state University named after M. V. Lomonosova, legal. fact., 2008. - P. 89.

Marchenko M. N. Sources of law: textbook. / M. N. Marchenko. – M.: Moscow. state University named after M. V. Lomonosova, legal. fact., 2008. – P. 90.

Marchenko M. N. Sources of law: textbook. / M. N. Marchenko. – M.: Moscow. state University named after M. V. Lomonosova, legal. fact., 2008. – P. 76.