The main idea of ​​war is not a woman's face. The essay on war is not a woman's face. Anyone who says that war is not scary knows nothing about war...

Even on the eve of the war, on a fine June day, millions of people lived according to the peace calendar. At dawn on June 22, 1941, for everything Soviet people, at the same hour, at the same minute, an entire era ended and a new one burst in with terrible, stunning suddenness.

Writers, historians, journalists, military leaders and veteran soldiers - whoever has not taken up a pen to resurrect for us that moment of an unexpected shift in the life of an entire country, the consequences of which have affected and are affecting a whole chain of subsequent generations! Their books about the war have enormous historical and spiritual value, as living evidence of all the many-sided and incomprehensible things that made up the years of unprecedented confrontation between the two worlds.

A woman at war is what connects the works of B. Vasiliev and S. Alexievich. In one of the interviews with a newspaper journalist > to the question: > Svetlana Alexievich answered: >. The war has no woman's face. But from now on, after the books of B. Vasiliev and S. Alexievich, the face of the past war, the Patriotic War, carries within itself the great truth about the price paid by our people for victory - the lives, blood, and suffering of soldiers’ daughters, sisters, and mothers.

The story > is poignant and tragic story a war that took place far from the front and showed the best human and civic qualities in girls who became defenders of the Fatherland. Five female anti-aircraft gunners, led by Sergeant Major Vaskov, in May 1942, on a distant patrol, confront a detachment of selected German paratroopers. Fragile girls enter into mortal combat with strong men trained to kill. Alexievich's book > is not a novel or a story, this book is documentary. It is compiled from records and stories of hundreds of women front-line soldiers: doctors, signalmen, sappers, pilots, snipers, shooters, anti-aircraft gunners, paratroopers, sailors, traffic controllers, drivers, ordinary field bath and laundry detachments, cooks, and collected testimonies from partisans and underground women. >,” wrote the marshal Soviet Union A. I. Eremenko. Among the girls there were Komsomol members of a tank battalion, and mechanic-drivers of heavy tanks, and in the infantry there were commanders of a machine gun company, machine gunners, although in our language the words >, >, > do not have feminine, because this work has never been done by a woman before.

In the most terrible war of the 20th century, a woman had to become a soldier. She not only saved and bandaged the wounded, but also shot from >, bombed, blew up bridges, went on reconnaissance, took >. The woman killed. She killed the enemy, who attacked her land, her home, and her children with unprecedented cruelty. But nothing is forgotten, how can a person forget something like that? We, who did not experience this, or today’s young people - do we have the right not to try to find out about everything that they, women, endured, experienced, suffered, did for us!? History never dies. She is a part of us, our feat, our yesterday. The search expanded, the names of the living and the dead were resurrected. The theme of the Great Patriotic War is an unusual topic. Unusual, because so much has been written about the war that a whole book would not be enough if you only remembered the titles of the works. The date of May 9 fills hearts with pride for the feat of the multinational Soviet people, who won the battle against fascism, and with sadness: millions of sons and daughters of the Fatherland remained forever in their own and in foreign lands. Unusual because it never ceases to excite people, opening up old wounds and souls with heartache. Unusual because memory and history merged into one.

There are so many girls, so many destinies: everyone is different. But in one thing they are still similar: all destinies were broken and disfigured by the war. Having received an order not to let the Germans get to the railway, the girls own lives fulfilled it. 5 girls and a foreman - these are the main characters of the story > They are all so different, but so similar.

Rita Osyanina, strong-willed and gentle, rich in spiritual beauty. She is the most courageous, fearless, strong-willed, she is a mother! She married > at less than eighteen years of age. She sent her son Alik to his parents. Her husband died heroically on the second day of the war.

Zhenya Komelkova is cheerful, funny, beautiful, mischievous to the point of adventurism, desperate and tired of war, pain and love. The first beauty of the road, she grew up in a good family. She loved to have fun, and one fine day she fell in love with Colonel Luzhin. It was he who picked her up at the front. He had a family, and Zhenya was sent on this patrol for contacting him.

Sonya Gurvich- the embodiment of an excellent student and a poetic nature - the “beautiful stranger”, who came out of a volume of poems by A. Blok. She is an orphan, her parents most likely died in Minsk. At that time she was studying in Moscow, preparing for the session. She was a translator in the detachment.

Galya Chetvertak asked to go to war because she dreamed of a heroic deed. The real world demanded not heroic impulses, but strict execution of military regulations. And she was confused, unable to overcome her fear.

Lisa Brichkina - >

Galya, who never grew up, is a funny and childishly clumsy girl from an orphanage. Notes, escape from orphanage and also dreams. become the new Lyubov Orlova. None of them had time to fulfill their dreams, they simply did not have time to live their own lives.

Death was different for everyone, just as their fates were different: Rita’s was an effort of will and a shot in the temple, Zhenya’s was desperate and a little reckless (she could have hidden and stayed alive, but she didn’t); Sonya has a dagger in the heart; in Galya - as painful and helpless as herself, in Lisa - “Oh, Lisa-Lizaveta, she didn’t have time, she couldn’t overcome the quagmire of war.” And Sergeant Major Vaskov, whom I have not yet mentioned, remains alone. One in the midst of trouble, torment, one with death, one with three prisoners. Is it alone? He now has five times the strength. And what was best in him, human, but hidden in his soul, was all revealed suddenly, and what he experienced, he felt for himself and for them, for his girls, him >. All five girls died, but each of them carries some kind of life principle, and all of them together represent feminine life.

We are accustomed to the fact that in war there is no place for sentimentality and tenderness, and the word “hero” in our understanding is necessarily a fighter, a soldier, in a word, a man. Everyone knows the names: Zhukov, Rokossovsky, Panfilov and many others, but few people know the names of those girls who are right from prom ended up in a war, without whom, perhaps, there would have been no victory.

Few people know that nurses pulled wounded soldiers from the battlefield to the whistling of bullets. If for a man the defense of the Fatherland is a duty, a sacred duty, then women went to the front voluntarily. They were not accepted because of their young age, but they went anyway. They went and mastered professions that had previously been considered only for men: pilot, tanker, anti-aircraft gunner. They walked and killed enemies no worse than men. It was difficult for them, but they still went. It just so happens that our memory of the war and all our ideas about the war are male. This is understandable: it was mostly men who fought, although hundreds of books have been written about women who participated in the Great Patriotic War, there is a considerable amount of memoir literature, and it convinces us that we are dealing with a historical phenomenon. Never before in the history of mankind have so many women participated in war. The Great Patriotic War showed the world an example of the massive participation of Soviet women in the defense of their Motherland.

Women's memory covers that continent of human feelings in war, which usually eludes men's attention. If a man was captivated by war as an action, then a woman felt and endured it differently due to her psychology: bombing, death, suffering - for her this is not the whole war. The woman felt more strongly, again due to her psychological and physiological characteristics, the reboots of the war - physical and moral, she endured war more difficult. And what she remembered, took out from mortal hell, today has become a unique spiritual experience, the experience of limitless human possibilities, which we have no right to consign to oblivion.

Not famous snipers, not famous pilots or partisans, but ordinary girls are the heroes of S. Alexievich’s book. >,” said Alexandra Iosifovna Mishutina, sergeant, medical instructor. In the words of a simple woman who went through the entire war, then got married, gave birth to three children and was imprisoned main idea books. Taken together, the women's stories paint a picture of a war that does not have a feminine face at all. They sound like evidence and accusations against the fascism of yesterday, the fascism of today, and the fascism of the future. Mothers, sisters, wives blame fascism. A woman accuses fascism. Nobody wanted to put up with the fact that a fascist was walking on your land.

From the memoirs of Vera Iosifovna Odinets: > She pressed the mark like that

And laid so many on the ground,

That twenty years and thirty years

The living cannot believe that they are alive.

K. Simonov

Sofya Konstantinovna Dubnyakova was a medical instructor during the war, but do you know what it is, a medical instructor of a tank company? The tanks rushed to attack, and she, an eighteen-year-old girl, should be nearby when her help is needed. There is no space for a medical instructor in the car: God forbid we can squeeze in all those shooting and driving the tank. Clinging to the iron staples, yesterday's schoolgirl lay spread out on top of the armor, and the only thought in her was not about cutting fragments, bullets, but about not getting her legs pulled into the tracks. And you have to watch and not miss the moment if someone’s tank catches fire: run, crawl, climb and help the wounded, burned tankers get up before the ammunition explodes. > - > And here is what nurse Maria Seliverstovna Bozhok remembered: >.

I left my childhood for a dirty car,

To an infantry echelon, to a medical platoon.

I listened to distant breaks and did not listen

Forty-first year, accustomed to everything.

I came from school to damp dugouts,

From Beautiful lady in > and >.

Because the name is closer than Russia

I couldn't find it.

Yu. Drunina

Woman and war are incompatible concepts, if only because a woman gives life, while any war is, first of all, murder. It was difficult for any person to take the life of his own kind, but what was it like for a woman in whom, according to B. Vasiliev, hatred of murder is inherent in her very nature? In his story, the writer showed very well what it was like for a girl to kill for the first time, even an enemy. Rita Osyanina hated the Nazis quietly and mercilessly. But it’s one thing to wish someone dead, and quite another to kill someone yourself. > In order to kill calmly, you had to get used to it, to harden your soul. This is also a feat and at the same time a huge sacrifice of our women, who, for the sake of life on earth, had to step over themselves, go against their nature. By the end of the story, all the main characters die, and with the death of each, a small thread with > is broken. From chapter to chapter, the bitterness of the irreversibility of losses increases. They sound like a kind of requiem in last chapter words of the foreman: >. It is at this moment that you truly deeply comprehend the meaning of the words of the dying Rita Osyanina about her understanding of love for the Motherland and the sacred duty of every person to her: >. Rita Osyanina’s words are lofty, solemn and at the same time so natural in the dying minute. They sound like a testament from a mother to her son, to the younger generation, which will live after her, is removed mental anguish and suffering from Vaskov, justify the inevitability of a tragic outcome. These words also reveal the common fate of Rita Osyanina’s generation - >, whose feat was dictated by a high sense of duty to the Motherland and its people.

“And the dawns here are quiet, quiet, I only saw them today>> Everything will pass, but the place will remain the same. Quiet, silent, beautiful, and only the marble gravestones will turn white, reminding of what has already passed.

Sometimes I feel connected

Between those who are alive

And who was taken away by the war.

No, nothing is forgotten.

No, no one is forgotten

Even that one.

Who lies in an unknown grave.

Yu. Drunina

The war changed them. The war shaped me because it saw me at the age of developing my character and outlook on life. The war forced them to see a lot, much of what it would be better for a person not to see at all, especially for a woman. The war made me think about a lot, about war and evil, for example. About life and death. About those questions that a person learns to answer to some extent after living his life. And they were just beginning to live.

In war, they not only shoot, bomb, go hand-to-hand, dig trenches - they also wash clothes, cook porridge, and bake bread. For a soldier to fight well, he must be dressed, shod, fed, washed, otherwise he will be a bad soldier. There are many examples in military history when a dirty and hungry army was defeated simply because it was dirty and hungry. The army walked in front, and behind it were laundresses, bakers, and cooks.

Valentina Kuzminichna Borshchevskaya, lieutenant, political officer of the field laundry detachment, recalls: >, >, and one laundress was awarded the Order of the Red Star. The best laundress, she did not leave the trough: it happened that everyone no longer had the strength to fall, and she washed. It was an elderly woman.>> How do we count our lives? Usually we divide it into the time before first love, before the first child, before college, after college, and for them, to these marks human life the word > is added, with the obligatory prefix > and >: what happened before the war, what happened during the war, what after.

Was it possible to defeat a people whose woman, in the most difficult hour, when the scales of history swung so terribly, dragged both her own wounded and another’s wounded soldier from the battlefield? Is it possible to believe that a people whose woman wanted to give birth to a girl and believed that she would have a different fate, not hers, that this people wants war? Was it in the name of this that a woman saved a life - she was a mother, daughter, wife, sister and Soldier?

But even on the eve of the war, on a fine June day, millions of people lived according to the peace calendar. But at dawn on June 22, 1941, for the entire Soviet people, at the same hour, at the same minute, an entire era ended and a new one burst in with terrible, stunning suddenness.

1

The novel of voices by S. Alexievich “War does not have a woman’s face” is studied. A comparative analysis of the context with the participant’s memories was carried out Battle of Stalingrad Zoya Alexandrovna Troitskaya is a resident of the city of Kamyshin before the events of the Great Patriotic War and now. It was revealed that the work reveals a new understanding of the problem of personality in literature, in-depth interest in inner world women. In the writer's field of vision it turns out state of mind a person who has undergone enormous upheavals, and it helps to comprehend what was happening to society as a whole. The facts of the biography of individual heroines merge into one complex life-intricacy. The conducted research allows us to come to the conclusion that the “novel of voices” can be called a synthetic biography, since it represents the process of a woman’s accumulation of experience belonging to individual and the entire era, the author chose such eyewitness accounts that objectively speak about subjective perception terrible events of the war, allow us to create a holistic picture of what is happening.

eyewitness memories.

context

benchmarking

synthetic autobiography

1. Alexievich S. War does not have a woman’s face. – M.: Pravda, 1988. – 142 p.

2. Dictionary of the Russian language: in 4 volumes / ed. A.P. Evgenieva. – M., 1982. – T.2.

5. Popova Z.D. Languages national consciousness. Questions of theory and methodology / Z.D. Po-pova, I.A. Sternin. – Voronezh, 2002. – P.26.

Every year the events of the Great Patriotic War move away from us living today, and, thinking about what the Soviet people had to endure, you understand: each of them is a hero. In 1983, the book “War Doesn’t Have a Woman’s Face” was written. She spent two years in the publishing house. The censorship representatives accused the journalist of all sorts of things. The novel of voices “War Has Not a Woman’s Face” was published in 1985. After this, the book was republished several times here and in other countries.

The purpose of this work is to study the work of Svetlana Alexievich “War does not have a woman’s face” in the aspect of compliance with the interpretation of the events of the Battle of Stalingrad from the point of view of other eyewitnesses. The research material was based on the memoirs of Zoya Aleksandrovna Troitskaya, a veteran of the Great Patriotic War.

Svetlana Alexievich dedicated her “novel of voices” to the exploits of Russian women. The author himself defines the genre of the work as documentary prose. The book is based on over 200 women's stories. This determines the relevance of the problem, since the work is evidence of an era that played a decisive role in the life of the country. The scientific novelty of the topic is due to the low degree of knowledge of the writer’s work.

The work can be called a synthetic biography, since it represents the process of a woman’s accumulation of experience belonging to an individual and an entire era.

“For four painful years I have been walking, burned by kilometers of other people’s pain and memory,” collecting stories of women front-line soldiers: doctors, snipers, pilots, shooters, tank crews. There was no specialty in the war that was not given to them. On the pages of his stories, Alexievich interviews the war participants themselves, so each one is a story of heroes. Those who fought and survived this war. Svetlana listened, noting: “Everything they have: both words and silence is a text for me.” Making notes in notebooks, Alexievich decided that she would not speculate, guess or add anything for the front-line soldiers. Let them talk...

Svetlana Alexievich tried to reduce a big story to one person in order to understand something. But even in the space of one and only human soul everything became not only no clearer, but even more incomprehensible than in great history: “You cannot have one heart for hatred and another for love. A person has only one.” And women are fragile, tender - are they really created for war?

With each chapter, with each story, you begin to think differently. Everything that surrounds us is little things. Another thing is important: to see your children happy, to hear them laugh. Falling asleep and waking up next to your loved one and knowing that he is nearby. See the sun, the sky, the peaceful sky.

The work reveals a new understanding of the problem of personality in literature, an in-depth interest in the inner world of a woman. In the author's field of view is the mental state of a person who has undergone enormous upheavals, and it helps to comprehend what was happening to society as a whole. The facts of the biography of individual heroines merge into one complex life-intricacy. Proof of which is a comparative analysis of the context with the memoirs of Zoya Aleksandrovna Troitskaya, a participant in the Battle of Stalingrad, a resident of the city of Kamyshin.

Zoya Aleksandrovna says that she decided to volunteer to go to the front: “At the military registration and enlistment office they gave me a tunic, belts and caps, and I had my own shoes. They immediately dressed us, took the bags that our parents had collected for us, and gathered in the park...” Let’s compare how the heroine of the novel of voices, Maria Ivanovna Morozova, talks about being sent to the front: “We came to the military registration and enlistment office, they immediately led us through one door and out the other: I braided such a beautiful braid, and left without it... Without a braid. .. They cut their hair like a soldier... And they took away the dress. I didn’t have time to give my mother either the dress or the braid. She really asked that she keep something from me, something of mine. They immediately dressed us in tunics and caps, gave us duffel bags, and loaded us onto a freight train on straw. But the straw was fresh, it still smelled like the field.”

“We started saying goodbye, the ferry arrived, we were all herded there. Our parents remained on the steep bank. And we swam to the other side. We were transported to the other side. And we walked along this left bank all the way to Krasny Yar. This is just the village opposite Stalingrad” (according to the memoirs of Z. Troitskaya).

In the book, S. Alexievich continues the story with the heroine Elena Ivanovna Babina: “From Kamyshin, where we took the oath, we marched on foot along the left bank of the Volga all the way to Kapustin Yar. The reserve regiment was stationed there." Dry parts. Comparing the memories of Z. Troitskaya with the events of the novel of voices, we understand that the author, despite numerous reproaches from critics, in this case softens the difficulties of the moment of transition: “Our junk, our bags were carried on oxen, because the horses were at the front at that time. And this was our first test, because many were wearing different shoes, not everyone had boots: some had boots, some had felt boots, galoshes. Many feet were chafed. Someone fell behind us, someone drove ahead in a car. Well, in general, we got there - we walked twenty kilometers. And so in Kapusny Yar some were sent to Rodimtsev, and some were sent to the 138th division. Lyudnikov was commanded there by Ivan Ilyich.”

The girls were trained in just a few days. “In Krasny Yar they taught communications for ten days. Rima was a radio operator, and Valya, I and Zina became telephone operators” (according to Troitskaya’s memoirs). Alexievich chooses the memoirs of Maria Ivanovna Morozova, which absorb all the details of entering military life: “We started studying. We studied regulations, ... camouflage on the ground, chemical protection. ... With our eyes closed, we learned to assemble and disassemble a “sniper gun,” determine wind speed, target movement, distance to the target, dig cells, and crawl on our bellies.”

Each had their own first meeting with death, but one thing unites them: the fear that then settles in the heart forever, that your life can easily be cut short: “I had a curious incident - my first, so to speak, meeting with a German. We went to the Volga for water: they made an ice hole there. Run quite far after the bowlers. It was my turn. I ran, and here the shelling with tracer bullets began. It was scary, of course, there was a rumble here. I got halfway, and there was a bomb crater. The shelling began. I jumped there, and there was a dead German there, so I jumped out of the crater. I forgot about water. Run quickly” (according to Troitskaya’s memoirs).

Let’s compare with the memories of ordinary signal operator Nina Alekseevna Semenova: “We arrived at Stalingrad... There were mortal battles there. The deadliest place... The water and the ground were red... And now we need to cross from one bank of the Volga to the other. ... They wanted to leave me in reserve, but I made such a roar... In the first battle, the officers pushed me off the parapet, I stuck my head out to see everything for myself. There was some kind of curiosity, childish curiosity... Naive! The commander shouts: “Private Semenova! Private Semenova, you’re crazy! Such a mother... She’ll kill you!” I couldn’t understand this: how could this kill me if I had just arrived at the front? I didn’t yet know how ordinary and indiscriminate death was. You can’t beg her, you can’t persuade her. They transported the people's militia in old semi-trucks. Old men and boys. They were given two grenades and sent into battle without a rifle; the rifle had to be obtained in battle. After the battle there was no one to bandage... All were killed...”

Klavdia Grigorievna Krokhina, senior sergeant, sniper: “We are lying down, and I am watching. And then I see: one German stood up. I clicked and he fell. And so, you know, I was shaking all over, I was pounding all over. I started crying. When I was shooting at targets - nothing, but here: how did I kill a man?..”

Overcoming themselves, they brought Victory closer, the road to which began from Stalingrad: “At this time, the surrender of the Germans was being prepared, ultimatums were presented, and our banners began to be displayed, erected on the ruins of a department store. The commander has arrived - Chuikov. I started traveling around the division. And on February 2 they held a rally and danced, sang, and hugged, and shouted, and shot, and kissed, oh, and the guys drank vodka. Of course, we didn't drink much, but the point is that it was all a piece of victory. This was already the hope that the Germans would not go, as they planned, to the Urals. We had faith in victory, in the fact that we would win” (Troitskaya). And every participant in the war has the same feeling: “I only remember one thing: they shouted - victory! There was a cry all day... Victory! Victory! Brothers! We won... And we were happy! Happy!!” .

There are lines in the book by the author that she was no longer worried about the description of military operations, but about a person’s life in war, every little detail of everyday life. After all, these untrained girls were ready for a feat, but not for life in war. Did they really imagine that they would have to wrap up foot wraps, wear boots two or three sizes too big, crawl on their bellies, dig trenches...

The women in this book are strong, courageous, honest, but above all, they need peace. How much we had to overcome, how difficult it is to continue our journey with these memories. life path. We are sincerely proud of everyone about whom this work is about and about whom books have not been written. The conducted research allows us to come to the conclusion that the “novel of voices” can be called a synthetic biography, since it represents the process of a woman’s accumulation of experience belonging to an individual and an entire era; the author chose eyewitness accounts that objectively speak about the subjective perception of the terrible events of the war , allow you to create a holistic picture of what is happening.

Reviewers:

Brysina E.V., Doctor of Philology, Professor, Head of the Department of General and Slavic-Russian Linguistics, Volgograd Social Pedagogical University, Volgograd;

Aleshchenko E.I., Doctor of Philology, Professor of the Department of General and Slavic-Russian Linguistics, Volgograd Social Pedagogical University, Volgograd

Bibliographic link

Latkina T.V. ON THE QUESTION OF DETERMINING THE GENRE OF SVETLANA ALEXIEVICH’S WORK “WAR HAS NOT A FEMALE FACE” // Modern problems of science and education. – 2015. – No. 2-1.;
URL: http://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=20682 (access date: 02/06/2020). We bring to your attention magazines published by the publishing house "Academy of Natural Sciences"

What is the feat of a woman in war? What role did women play during the Great Patriotic War? It is these questions that the writer S.A. Aleksievich is trying to answer in her text.

Revealing the problem of a woman’s feat in war, the author relies on his own reasoning, life facts. On the one hand, a woman is first and foremost a mother, she gives life. But during the Great Patriotic War she had to become a soldier. She killed the enemy in defense of her home and children. Immortality of the Russian feat Soviet woman we are still figuring it out. Explaining the heroic deeds of women, Alexievich uses a quote from Leo Tolstoy, who wrote about the “hidden warmth of patriotism.”

The writer is amazed by the fact that yesterday’s schoolgirls and students voluntarily went to the front, making a choice between life and death, and this choice turned out to be as simple as breathing for them. With the help of rhetorical questions, the author emphasizes that the people, whose woman in difficult times dragged her wounded and another’s wounded soldier from the battlefield, cannot be defeated. S. Aleksievich calls on us to sacredly honor women, to bow low to the ground.

The author's position is expressed directly: the feat of women in the war lies in the fact that she passionately wanted to give all her strength to save the Motherland. She fought on an equal basis with men: she saved the wounded, carrying them from the battlefield, blew up bridges, went on reconnaissance, and killed a cruel enemy.

Let's look at literary examples. B.L. Vasiliev’s story “The Dawns Here Are Quiet” tells about the feat of five girls - anti-aircraft gunners. Each of them had their own account with the Nazis. Rita Osyanina's husband, a border guard, died on the first day of the war. Leaving her little son in the care of her mother, the young woman went to the front to defend her Motherland. Zhenya Komelkova’s relatives, like the family of command personnel, were shot, and the girl saw the execution from the basement, where an Estonian woman hid her. Orphanage Galka Chetvertak took credit for a year by forging a document in order to go to war. Both Sonya Gurvich, who went to the front from her student days, and Liza Brichkina, who dreamed of happiness in a remote forest region, became anti-aircraft gunners. The girls die in an unequal duel with sixteen German saboteurs. Each of them could become a mother, but the thread that could connect them with the future was broken, and this is the unnaturalness and tragedy of the war.

Let's give another example. In V. Bykov’s story “His Battalion,” medical instructor Veretennikova Vera was discharged from the army as unfit for combat service, as she was expecting a child from common-law husband- company commander Lieutenant Samokhin, but she refuses to obey the military order, she wants to be close to her loved one. Voloshin's battalion must take a height well fortified by the Germans. Recruits are afraid to go on the attack. Faith drives them out of the swamp and forces them to move forward. She had to survive the death of the father of her unborn child, but she herself dies without ever becoming a mother.

We came to the conclusion that the feat of women during the war years is immortal. They were ready to give their lives to save their homeland, took part in battles, and saved the wounded.

Updated: 2017-09-24

Attention!
If you notice an error or typo, highlight the text and click Ctrl+Enter.
By doing so, you will provide invaluable benefit to the project and other readers.

Thank you for your attention.

War has always been a great grief for the people. It is difficult to imagine what terrible victims and losses this asocial phenomenon leaves in its wake.

The enemy was inhuman in the full sense of the word. Following the principles of belief in the existence of a superior Aryan race, countless people were destroyed. How many people were taken into slavery, how many perished in concentration camps, how many villages were burned at that time... The scale of destruction and human casualties is shocking and is unlikely to leave anyone indifferent.

It seemed that fighting was a man's business. But no! Women also stood up to defend the Motherland, enduring all the hardships of wartime just like men. Their contribution to the approach Great victory invaluable.

Writer Boris Vasiliev in his story “The Dawns Here Are Quiet...” describes the life and death of five female anti-aircraft gunners. Having come to the war of their own free will, almost unable to shoot, they die at the hands of fascist intelligence, defending themselves and their homeland. Women and girls, very young and young, the war does not set boundaries of age and gender, here everyone and everyone is a soldier. There were Germans in the rear, and every soldier felt his duty to his homeland to stop and destroy the enemy at any cost. And they will stop him, but at the cost of their lives. The narration is conducted on behalf of the commandant of the patrol, Vaskov. The whole story is based on his memories. Within the framework of the post-war period, there is a narrative about the past horrors of an inhumane war. And this plays an important role in the ideological and artistic perception of the story. This story was written by a person who visited and went through the entire war, so it is all written believably and excitingly, with a vivid highlighting of all the horrors of war. The author dedicates his story moral problem formation and transformation of the character and psyche of the individual in war conditions. The painful topic of war, unjust and cruel, the behavior of different people in its conditions is shown by the example of the heroes of the story. Each of them has his own attitude to the war, his own motives for fighting the Nazis, except for the main ones, and all of them different people. And it is these soldiers, young girls, who will have to prove themselves in war conditions; For some it’s their first time, and for others not. Not all girls show heroism and courage, not all remain firm and persistent after the first battle, but all girls die. Only foreman Vaskov remains alive and carries out the execution of the order to the end.

Each Vasiliev character has its own flavor and its own range of feelings. The events that take place make you empathize with each character. After reading the story and watching the film adaptation, there is a feeling of pain and pity for the young anti-aircraft gunners who died a brave death in the name of liberating the Motherland. No one could have known that, having received the task of going and capturing two German intelligence officers, a small detachment of six people would stumble upon sixteen fascist soldiers. The forces are incomparable, but neither the foreman nor the five girls even think about retreating. They don’t choose. All five young anti-aircraft gunners are destined to die in this forest. And not everyone will suffer a heroic death. But in the story everything is measured with the same measure. As they said during the war, there is one life and one death. And all the girls can equally be called true heroines of war.

At first glance, what could the responsible, strict Rita Osyanina, the insecure dreamer Galya Chetvertak, the throwing Sonya Gurvich, the silent Liza Brichkina and the mischievous, daring beauty Zhenya Komelkova have in common? But, oddly enough, not even a shadow of misunderstanding arises between them. This is due in no small part to the fact that they were brought together by exceptional circumstances. It is not for nothing that Fedot Evgrafych will later call himself the girls’ brother, and it is not for nothing that he will take upon himself the care of the son of the deceased Rita Osyanina. There is still in these six, despite the difference in age, upbringing, education, a unity of attitude towards life, people, war, devotion to the Motherland and readiness to give their lives for it. The six of them need to hold their positions at all costs, as if “all of Russia came together” behind them. And they keep it.

Let's look at each character separately. Let's start with commandant Fedot Efgrafovich Vaskov. A lonely person is encrypted under this character. For him, there was nothing left in life except the charters, regulations, orders of his superiors and the department entrusted to him. The war took everything away. Therefore, he devoted himself completely to the service of his Motherland. He lived strictly according to the rules, as prescribed, and imposed this rule on everyone who surrounded him. Many platoons were assigned to him, and he constantly asked his superiors to send him others. The platoons consisted of young guys who did not disdain alcohol and walks with young ladies. All this incredibly irritated Vaskov and constantly pushed him to make another request for a replacement. Of course, such requests irritated the management themselves.

The authorities once again did not ignore Vaskov’s request. And it’s true: the anti-aircraft gunners sent did not drink alcohol. You could also forget about walking with the ladies, because the anti-aircraft gunners themselves are girls! “So they sent non-drinkers...” - this is how the foreman reacted to the arrival of the newcomers. One can understand him; the man is accustomed to young men who have wind in their heads and completely wrong thoughts, even though there is a war going on. And then a crowd of young girls appeared in front of him, who didn’t even really hold a weapon in their hands. And here they are, young beauties that have not yet been shot, fall into Vaskov’s possession. In addition to their pleasant appearance, the new arrivals were also sharp-tongued. It was impossible without witty remarks and jokes addressed to the foreman. All this humiliated Vaskov. But the girls themselves were decisive and, moreover, economical. Everything changed in the commandant's life. Could he have expected this? And could he have known that these stupid girls would later become almost like family to him? But all this will come later, for now there is war, and we must not forget that even these girls are soldiers. And they have the same debt as Vaskov. Despite the noticeable rudeness, Vaskov shows concern for all five anti-aircraft gunners whom he chose to capture two, as it seemed then, German saboteurs. The image of Vaskov experiences a rebirth throughout the story. But not only the foreman himself is the reason for this. The girls also contributed a considerable share, each in their own way. Meanwhile, a spark of sympathy runs past Vaskov and the young “savage” Liza Brichkina. Vaskov trusts her, knowing that she lived all the time on the cordon in the forest, and therefore knew every little detail of the forest and noticed everything that did not belong to these little things. Everyone was surprised when Lisa answered the question “Have you noticed anything strange?” answered: “The dew has been knocked off the bushes,” everyone was stunned, especially Vaskov.

Fedot Efgrafovich is having a hard time experiencing the death of the girls. He became mentally attached to each of them, each of the deaths left a scar on his heart.

All these scars kindled terrible hatred in the heart of the sergeant major. The thirst for revenge ruled Vaskov’s consciousness after the death of Rita Osyanina, who asked to take her little son to her. Vaskov will subsequently replace his father.

The Germans also suffered losses and were noticeably weakened. However, Vaskov was still alone against them. The command of the saboteurs remained unharmed. Filled with anger and the desire to avenge the young anti-aircraft gunners, he breaks into the monastery (where the Germans set up headquarters) and takes prisoner everyone who was in it. They may not have known Russian, but they certainly understood everything that Vaskov laid out for them. He instilled in them the fear of the sight of a Russian soldier, whom they had deprived of people very dear to him. It became clear that they were now powerless, and they had no choice but to submit to the will of Vaskov, who managed to get the better of them. And only then Vaskov allowed himself to “relax” when he saw girls calling him behind him, rushing to his aid. Vaskov’s arm was shot, but his heart hurt many times more. He felt guilty for the death of each of the girls. The death of some could have been prevented if the circumstances of each of them were analyzed. Without losing the pouch, he might have avoided the death of Sonya Gurvich; Without sending Lisa Brichkina on an empty stomach, and by more convincingly forcing her to take a good rest on an island in the swamp, her death could also have been avoided. But was it possible to know all this in advance? You won't bring anyone back. And the last request of Rita Osyanina, the last of the five anti-aircraft gunners, became a real order, which Vaskov simply did not dare to disobey. There is a moment in the story when Vaskov, deprived of that very shot hand, together with the son of the late Rita, lays flowers on a memorial plaque with the names of all five female anti-aircraft gunners. And he raised him as his own, feeling a sense of fulfilled duty to Margarita Osyanina, who died in the name of the Motherland.

The story of Elizaveta Brichkina, who suffered an absurd, but terrible and painful death, is complex. Lisa is a silent, somewhat withdrawn girl. She lived with her parents on a cordon in the forest. Filled with a sense of hope for happiness and anticipation of a bright future, she walked through life. She always remembered her parents' parting words and promises of a “happy tomorrow.” Having lived surrounded by forest, she learned and understood everything that relates to it. Lisa was a thrifty and strong girl quite adapted to life. But at the same time, she was very vulnerable and sentimental. Before the war, Lisa fell in love only once. But the feelings turned out to be non-reciprocal. Lisa was worried, but, being strong spirit, she endured this pain, realizing with her young mind that this was not the last pain and that life would throw a worse test, and in the end the same “tomorrow” that Lisa had been dreaming about all her life would certainly come.

Once in the detachment of anti-aircraft gunners, Lisa was calm and restrained. It was difficult to call her the soul of the company, like, for example, Kiryanova, who loved gossip and jokes about Vaskov to death. Lisa was not a gossip, and therefore did not take part in such conversations. Besides all this, she liked Vaskov. And she could not help but object to Kiryanova when she began to spread gossip about the commandant in front of everyone. In response, she heard only ridicule. Lisa could not stand it and hurried away in tears. And only Rita, as the squad leader, made a remark to Kiryanova and ran to calm Lisa down, making her understand that she needed to be simpler and should not believe such slander.

When Osyanina noticed two German saboteurs, Vaskov began to assemble a detachment of five girls. Lisa, without hesitation, asked to join everyone. Vaskov agreed. Throughout the journey, Lisa surprised Vaskov, attracting his attention more and more. Vaskov said to her: “You take note of everything, Lizaveta, you are our forest man...”. Even when the entire squad was walking through the swamp, Lisa never stumbled and, in addition, helped the others if someone stumbled, fell through, or simply could not pull their leg out of the viscous mess. Having arrived at the place, everyone began to arrange their own observation positions. Lisa arranged the place for herself competently and comfortably. Arriving at her, Vaskov could not resist praising her. Getting ready to leave, he sang a song to her: “Liza, Liza, Lizaveta, why don’t you send me greetings...”. Lisa wanted to say how they sing this song in her homeland, but Vaskov gently cut her off: “We’ll sing with you later, Lizaveta. Here, let’s carry out the combat order and sing...” These words instilled hope in the heart of young Lisa. She realized that now her feelings were mutual and the long-awaited happiness was now also close.

Realizing the danger of the situation, when instead of two saboteurs sixteen appeared on the horizon, Vaskov immediately knew who he would send for help. Having given Brichkina all the instructions, he finally said: “Blow, Lizaveta Batkovna!”, jokingly, of course.

Lisa was in a hurry. She wanted to bring help as soon as possible. All the way she thought about the words of Fedot Evgrafovich and warmed herself with the thought that they would definitely carry out the order and sing. Passing through the swamp, Lisa experienced incredible fear, as the author tells us, “animal horror.” And this is understandable, because then, when she walked along with everyone, they would definitely have helped her if anything happened, but now she is alone, in a dead, deaf swamp, where there is not a single living soul who could help her. But Vaskov’s words and the proximity of the “cherished stump,” which was a landmark for Lisa, and therefore solid ground under her feet, warmed Lisa’s soul and lifted her spirits. But the author decides to take a tragic turn of events.

Seeing a suddenly appearing bubble that swelled almost next to her, Lisa stumbles and ends up in the very quagmire. Attempts to get out and heart-rending cries for help are in vain. And at the moment when the last moment in Lisa’s life has come, the sun appears as a promise of happiness and a symbol of hope. Everyone knows the saying: hope dies last. This is what happened to Lisa. All her hopes disappeared with her into the vile depths of the swamp. The author writes: “...All that was left of her was her skirt, which she tied to the edge of her bag*, and nothing else, not even the hope that help would come.”

Let's turn to the film adaptation of the story. In general, the film reflects both the events of war and peacetime, and the war was filmed in black and white colors, peacetime is in color. One of these “colored” fragments is a moment in Vaskov’s subconscious, when he was sitting on an island among an impassable swamp and thinking about the senseless death of Lisa, on whom he had great hopes, first of all, for the speedy arrival of help. Before us is a picture: Lisa appears on a white background, and Vaskov appears somewhere behind the scenes. He asks her: moral character girl war

How are you doing this, Lizaveta?..

I was in a hurry, Fedot Efgrafych.

Not of her own free will, but Lisa let her comrades down. However, the author does not condemn her; on the contrary, he sympathizes with her.

Watching the film, you can note that the image of Lisa in the story slightly does not correspond to the image from the film. In the story, Lisa is a dreamy and calm, but at the same time serious girl. Elena Drapeko, who played the role of Brichkina, somewhat misjudged the image of the “sentimental and dreamy Liza,” but the actress conveyed the rest of her qualities entirely. Elena Drapeko even played the death scene without an understudy. Five takes were filmed. The funnel into which the actress was supposed to dive was blown up and marked with dynamite. The scene was filmed in November, in cold mud, but the feelings that Lisa experienced when she was sucked deeper into the quagmire were fully conveyed; the actress herself confirms that she was truly scared during filming.

The death of Sonya Gurvich, who, trying to do a good deed, dies from an enemy blade, was unnecessary. A student preparing for the summer session is forced to fight the German occupiers. She and her parents were of the Jewish nation, and the policy of genocide intended to destroy, first of all, the Jews. It is not difficult to understand why Sonya ended up in the anti-aircraft detachment. Sonya got into the group that Vaskov recruited because she knew German and could explain herself. Like Brichkina, Sonya was quiet. In addition, she was very fond of poetry and often read them out loud, either to herself or to her comrades. To make things clear, Vaskov called her a translator and tried to protect her from danger. Before “crossing” the swamp, he ordered Brichkina to take her duffel bag and told her to follow him, then only everyone else. Vaskov dropped his memorable tobacco pouch. Sonya understood his feelings about the loss and decided to help him. Remembering where she had seen this pouch, Sonya rushed to look for it. Vaskov ordered her to return in a whisper, but Sonya no longer heard him. The German soldier who grabbed her plunged a knife into her chest. Not expecting that the girl would be in front, he made two blows with a knife, because the first of them did not immediately hit the heart. Therefore, Sonya managed to scream. Having decided to do a good deed for her boss, Sonya Gurvich passed away.

Sonya's death was the first loss of the detachment. That is why everyone, especially Vaskov, took it very seriously. Vaskov blamed himself for her death, talking about how Sonya could have lived if she had listened to him and stayed in place. But nothing could be done. She was buried, and Vaskov removed the buttonholes from her jacket. He will subsequently remove the same buttonholes from all the jackets of the dead girls.

The following three characters can be viewed simultaneously. These are the images of Rita Osyanina ( maiden name Mushtakov), Zhenya Komelkova and Gali Chetvertak. These three girls always stayed together. Young brat Zhenya was incredibly pretty. The cheerful “laugher” had a difficult life story. Before her eyes, her whole family was killed, her loved one died, so she had her own personal scores to settle with the Germans. She and Sonya came to Vaskov’s disposal a little later than the others, but nevertheless they immediately joined the team. She also did not immediately develop a friendship with Rita, but after a sincere conversation, both girls saw themselves as good friends. They also did not immediately accept homely Galya into their “company”. Galya showed herself as good man who will not betray and will give the last piece of bread to his comrade. Having managed to keep Rita's secret, Galya became one of them.

Young Galya lived in an orphanage. She got to the front by deception. But wanting to help the Red Army, she boldly committed deception by lying about her age. Galya was very timid. WITH early childhood Deprived of maternal warmth and care, she made up stories about her mother, believing that she was not an orphan, that her mother would return and take her. Everyone laughed at these stories, and unfortunate Galya swallowed the pain and tried to come up with other stories to amuse others.

Passing through the swamp, Galya “drowned” her boot before reaching the shore. Vaskov gave her a “chunya” by bandaging her spruce branches ropes around the legs. However, Galya still caught a cold. Vaskov covered her with his cap and gave her alcohol to drink, in the hope that Gala would feel better by the morning. After Sonya's death, Vaskov orders her boots to be put on. Galya immediately objected, starting to come up with another story about a non-existent mother who works as a doctor and forbids filming dead person shoes. Rita cruelly cut her off, telling everyone that she was a foundling, and there was no trace of her mother. Zhenya stood up for Galya. During war, it is very important for everyone to stick together and not quarrel. It is necessary to stand for each other and value each one, because one of them may no longer exist tomorrow. Zhenya says: “Now we need to be free from malice, otherwise we’ll become frantic like the Germans...”.

Gali's death can be called stupid. Succumbing to fright, she breaks away and runs screaming. A German bullet instantly overtakes her and Galya dies.

During her nineteen years, Rita Osyanina managed to be married and give birth to a son. By doing this, she aroused terrible envy on the part of her “co-workers.” Her husband died in the first days of the war. Rita herself became an anti-aircraft gunner, wanting to avenge her husband’s death. Once we were on the road, Rita began to run away to the city at night to visit her son and sick mother, returning in the morning. One day that same morning, Rita came across those two unfortunate saboteurs who brought so much trouble and loss to the entire department.

Left with the three of us, Vaskov and Zhenya, it was necessary to stop the enemy in every possible way, to prevent him from reaching Kirovskaya railway. It was useless to wait for help; ammunition was running out. At this moment, the heroism of the remaining girls and foreman Vaskov manifests itself. Rita was wounded and gradually lost blood. Zhenya, with the last bullets, began to lead the Germans away from her wounded friend, giving Vaskov time to help Rita. Zhenya accepted a heroic death. She wasn't afraid to die. The last bullets ran out, but Zhenya did not lose her self-esteem and died with her head held high, not surrendering to the enemy. Her last words meant that by killing one soldier, even a girl, you would not kill the entire Soviet Union. Zhenya literally cursed before her death, laying out everything that hurt her.

Not the entire German detachment was defeated. Rita and Vaskov knew this very well. Rita felt that she was losing a lot of blood and that her strength was running out, asking Vaskov to take her son in and look after her mother. Then she admits to her nightly escapes from the location. What's the difference now? Rita clearly understood that death was inevitable, which is why she opened up to Vaskov. Rita could have survived, but why did she decide to commit suicide? Vaskov was left alone. Rita was wounded, moreover, she could not walk. Vaskov alone could have easily gotten out and brought help. But he would never leave a wounded soldier. And together with Rita, he will become an accessible target. Rita did not want to be a burden for him and decides to commit suicide, trying to help her elder. The death of Rita Osyanina is psychologically the most difficult moment of the story. B. Vasiliev very accurately conveys the state of a young twenty-year-old girl, perfectly aware that her wound is fatal and that nothing awaits her except torment. But at the same time, she was only concerned with one thought: she was thinking about her little son, realizing that her timid, sickly mother was unlikely to be able to raise her grandson. The strength of Fedot Vaskov is that he knows how to find the most accurate words at the right moment, so you can trust him. And when he says: “Don’t worry, Rita, I understood everything,” it becomes clear that he will really never leave little Alik Osyanin, but will most likely adopt him and raise him an honest man. The description of Rita Osyanina's death in the story takes only a few lines. At first a shot sounded quietly. “Rita shot in the temple, and there was almost no blood. Blue powder particles thickly surrounded the bullet hole, and for some reason Vaskov looked at them for a particularly long time. Then he took Rita aside and began to dig a hole in the place where she had been lying before.”

The subtext inherent in B. Vasiliev’s author’s style allows one to read between the lines that Vaskov kept his word, he adopted Rita’s son, who became a rocket captain, that all these years Vaskov remembered the dead girls and, most importantly, the respect of modern young people for military past. An unknown young man wanted to help carry the marble slab to the grave, but did not dare. I was afraid of hurting someone's sacred feelings. And as long as people on earth experience such respect for the fallen, there will be no war - this is the main meaning of the news “And the dawns here are quiet...”

It would seem how simple and everyday everything is, and how creepy this everydayness becomes. Such beautiful, young, absolutely healthy girls are disappearing into oblivion. This is the horror of war! That's why she shouldn't have a place on earth. In addition, B. Vasiliev emphasizes that someone needs to answer for the death of these girls, perhaps later, in the future. Sergeant Major Vaskov speaks about this simply and intelligibly: “As long as there is war, it’s understandable. And then, when will there be peace? Will it be clear why you had to die? Why didn’t I let these Krauts go further, why did I make such a decision? What to answer when they ask: why couldn’t you, men, protect our mothers from bullets? Why did you marry them with death, but you yourself remain intact?” After all, someone will have to answer these questions. But who? Perhaps all of us.

The tragedy and absurdity of what is happening emphasizes fabulous beauty Legontovo monastery, located next to the lake. And here, amid death and blood, “there was a grave silence, there was already a ringing in my ears.” So, war is an unnatural phenomenon. War becomes doubly terrible when women die, because it is then, according to B. Vasiliev, “the thread leading to the future breaks.” But the future, fortunately, turns out to be not only “eternal”, but also grateful. It is no coincidence that in the epilogue, a student who came to relax on Lake Legontovo wrote in a letter to a friend: “It turns out that they fought here, old man. We fought when we were not yet in the world... We found the grave - it is behind the river, in the forest... And the dawns here are quiet, I only saw it today. And pure, pure, like tears...” In B. Vasiliev’s story, the world triumphs. The girls’ feat has not been forgotten; their memory will be an eternal reminder that “war does not have a woman’s face.”

War does not have a woman's face... High school students write essays on this topic, not realizing how much cruel truth there is in this phrase. War was invented by men. But while inciting it, they could not protect their wives, daughters, mothers... It was, is, and, alas, will be. The article is devoted to the most disharmonious and unnatural picture in the history of mankind - a woman at war.

The most brutal war

Great Patriotic War- the most terrible war XX century. Over the years, the woman has learned to kill. She destroyed the enemy, who attacked her home with unprecedented cruelty. She blew up bridges, bombed and went on reconnaissance missions. She had no other choice.

Lyudmila Pavlichenko - Hero of the Great Patriotic War

It can be dedicated to both an individual and a collective image. IN national history There are many examples of female heroism. One of them is the image of Lyudmila Pavlichenko.

Expanding on the topic: “Woman at War,” the essay, without a doubt, can be dedicated to this extraordinary figure. The best female sniper in the entire history of the Soviet Union had three hundred fatal hits to her credit. Her heroism was admired and a sniper rifle was named in her honor. Pavlichenko dedicated songs, documentaries and feature films. Once, in 1942, at a meeting with American journalists, she uttered the legendary phrase about the gentlemen who were hiding behind her back. She was applauded.

Heroine or living legend?

Much has been said about the heroism of this woman. There is an opinion that her exploits are somewhat exaggerated. The country needs heroes. Real or fictional. But besides Lyudmila Pavlichenko, several hundred Soviet girls and women served at the front. Unlike the legendary sniper, they had the right to talk about what they experienced. But they spoke little. Talking about war is a man's business.

A woman by nature is intended to generate life, but not to destroy it. But if it is necessary to protect her home and her children, she will take up arms. And she will learn to kill. But after that it will remain on her soul heavy load, bleeding wound. A woman who takes a life is always scary. Even if this life belonged to the enemy, the fascist and the occupier. After all, war does not have a woman’s face...

An essay about how war can affect a person’s fate can be written on the basis of artistic and historical literature. But it is better to refer not to pretentious books about high-profile exploits, but to read the stories of simple eyewitnesses. They contain less propaganda and more truth.

Truth and fiction

Stories are not about heroes and winners, but about ordinary people- this is the book “War does not have a woman’s face.” The essay will become much more truthful if its topic is not the achievements of the legendary sniper, but fate ordinary women. Svetlana Alexievich is an author who wrote about women in war like no one else. She was accused of excessive naturalism and lack of patriotism. For her heroines, war means burnt faces after shelling, wounds from bullets and shrapnel. These are cauldrons with steaming porridge, which no one can eat, because out of a hundred people only seven returned from the battle.

For Lyudmila Pavlichenko, war is just an irreconcilable battle with a hated enemy. The memories of a Soviet sniper could not help but be subject to strict censorship. Therefore, they contain only part of the truth. I manage to believe more for women from the book Alexievich.

War is not only about battles and victories. These are many terrible and disgusting little things that add up to an overall picture that only male eyes can bear. Still, war does not have a woman’s face... Essay on Russian literature in military theme should be as truthful and reliable as possible. Its young author must know that war is a crime. She maims, she kills. And there are no winners in it.

I have only seen hand-to-hand combat once...

The Great Patriotic War made her a poetess. An essay on the topic “The Work of Yulia Drunina” should be written after first becoming more familiar not only with her poems, but also with her biography.

Since childhood, she dreamed of a feat. The thirst to participate in the Great Victory drove her to the military registration and enlistment office on June 22. She took her first steps at the front as a nurse. Then there was the Khabarovsk School of Junior Aviation Specialists. And finally - the Belarusian Front.

Young boys and girls died before Yulia Drunina’s eyes. Under fire, in the cold and mud, a seventeen-year-old girl from an intelligent Moscow family made her way with her fellow soldiers to the front line. She bandaged the wounded, was hungry, cold and saw corpses. And she wrote poetry in the trenches. “Front-line poetry of Yulia Drunina” - interesting topic, which is worth dedicating an essay to.

A person becomes stronger in war, unprecedented resources are discovered in him. But the experience remains in the soul forever.

Anyone who says that war is not scary knows nothing about war...

From childhood to the horrors of war - a motif that sounds even in Drunina’s later poems. Front-line nostalgia did not leave her until last days life. The war did not abandon the poetess even in peacetime. There were horrors, but there was also true friendship. There is no deception, no lies on the front line. And it is not easy for those who were brought up at the front to live in a world where everything is above all else. material assets. Especially when it comes to a woman. It is more difficult for her to adapt and adapt to a different way.

A terrible phenomenon that has no right to exist is a woman at war. Composition, dedicated to creativity poetess Yulia Drunina, should be based on this axiom. She lived for so long in her beautiful romantic world, and justified the horrors of war with such boundless love for her homeland that when this homeland was gone, she was gone too. The poetess tragically passed away in 1991.

And the dawns here are quiet...

War is not a woman’s business... An essay on literature on this topic cannot be completed without reading the story by Boris Vasiliev. This author was one of the first to talk about how women, along with men, defended their homeland. Five lives were cut short before reaching the 1945 milestone. They could have given birth to children, and they could have given birth to grandchildren, but the strings were broken. Sergeant Major Vaskov thought about this when he prepared the grave for one of them.

Vasilyev wrote many books about brave soldiers. The essay “Man at War” can be written using the example of one of them.

A wonderful, but, unfortunately, not without an ideological touch, the film, based on Vasiliev’s story in 1972, does not convey the thoughts of one of the heroines that came to her mind in the last moments of her life. In the wilds of the Karelian forests, leading the Germans with her, she ran and thought, “How stupid it is to die at eighteen!” Even a heroic death for a person who is just beginning his life’s journey is always stupid and monstrously absurd. Especially if this person is a woman.

Mother field

An essay on the topic “Years of War” can tell not only about exploits on the front line. And the horrors of battles are not the main theme in it. There are things worse than bombs and shelling. The worst thing is the fate of the mother who outlived her sons. Chingiz Aitmatov's story is dedicated to women who overcame all the hardships of war - hunger, daily exhausting work - but never received their children. A mother should not bury her son. She will not be able to come to terms with his death, no matter what valiant feat he performed. Even if her son is a Hero of the Great Patriotic War. An essay based on the work “Mother Field” allows you to explore the topic of tragic destinies soldiers' mothers.

Came to Berlin to kill the war

These words were written on the wall of the Reichstag by Sofia Kuntsevich, a girl who carried more than two hundred wounded from the battlefield. A journalistic and artistic work by Svetlana Alexievich is dedicated to her and other women.

This book is not about the big victory, but about the little people. The author looked at the topic of war from the perspective of a person who did not see it. She learned about it from the words of front-line soldiers. The stories and confessions that are presented in this work are pain and tears. And reading them, you see the true face of war. It is neither feminine nor masculine. It is completely inhuman.

However, there are lines in the book that prove that war is not capable of killing a woman. She cannot destroy the goodness and care inherent in nature.

German prisoners, exhausted by hunger, walk through a Russian village. Along those roads that they spent five years trying to burn and wipe out from the face of the earth. And Russian peasant women come out to meet them and offer them bread, potatoes, everything they have. In the present they have a destroyed house, in the future they are beggars post-war years. And life without men who did not return. But even this could not destroy compassion in women's hearts.

A topic that should remain one of the important ones in school curriculum- Great Patriotic War. An essay on women in war is difficult creative task. The victory was achieved not only thanks to male courage and bravery. War spares no one and is always impartial. Humanity is unable to get rid of it. It does not yet possess the humanity and wisdom necessary for this. But every man should understand from a young age that there is no place for a woman in war.